Skeptic Tank Text Archive File

Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

Organization: animal -- coelomate -- deuterostome From: (Chris Colby) Message-ID: <> Followup-To: Newsgroups: talk.religion.misc, In article <> (Ross Morley) writes: >Well I, for one, would like some rational explanation of why this >theory can't be true. Your response to this reasonably phrased and >seemlingly plausible theory does not engender any respect for your >view nor do anything at all to refute the theory. Read the newsgroup for awhile. I've set follow-ups to that group, BTW. >So what *is* the difference between dinosuars and present day >reptiles, apart from size? It's a matter of lineage. All reptiles share a common ancestor. Dinosaurs share a common ancestor that descended from the reptilian common ancestor -- only species in lineages descended from the dino-ancestor are called dinosaurs. (By this criteria, birds can be classified as dinosaurs, BTW.) Living reptiles are from a different lineage and can never be called dinosaurs. Incidentally, bigness is not necessarily a dinosaur feature -- there were plenty of small and average-size dinosaurs as well. Read "The Dinosaur Heresies" by Robert Bakker for a good, popular account of what is currently known about these animals. Recently (past 20 years or so), new evidence has forced paleontologists to rethink their views on dinosaurs. Bakker argues forcefully that dinosaurs were vigorous, warm-blooded animals, not dull, lumbering giants as they were previosly depicted. A very enjoyable book. Here's a phylogeny of the reptiles, in case you are curious. (extinct) (extinct) turtles mammals lizards snakes crocs s-dinos birds o-dinos * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * ** * * * * ancestral reptile "S-dinos" means saurishcian dinosaurs and "o-dinos" ornithiscian dinosaurs. Birds are the only living dinosaurs left (barring a surprize relic population somewhere -- very unlikely). Of course, most biologists call them "birds" not "dinosaurs" to emphasize their unique qualities. There are three main lineages of reptiles anapsids (turtles), diapsids (all the other groups in my cladogram except mammals) and synapsids (mammals). Like birds, most biologists call them by a unique name ("mammals") to stress the differences. This leaves the group of species what we do call reptiles without some of the lineages that "should" (if relationship were the only criteria) be included. In bio-speak, reptiles are a para-phyletic group. The information for the phylogeny came from a variety of sources. The best being "Vertebrate Palaeontology" by Michael J. Benton. P.S. Since this is crossposted to t.r.m I could mention that I generally post to and have written a file that explains evolutionary biology. Evolution is misunderstood by almost everyone. Mistakes such as saying that humans evolved from living apes or organisms do things for the good of their species or behave in a way to propagate their species are common misconceptions that are presented (often as fact) in TV nature shows and popular magazines. Furthermore, evolution is often represented as progress and the idea that one can construct an "evolutionary scale" going from "lower" to "higher" animals is a popular misconception most people have. These are serious mistakes, and the file I have written attempts to explain modern evolutionary biology and dispel these common misunderstandings. In addition a summary of the evidence supporting evolution is presented. If you would like a copy, email me at the address given in my .sig and I'll send you a copy. The file is about 20 pages in length and written (hopefully) so someone with little background in science or biology can understand it. >Ross Morley .---. email: Chris Colby --- email: ---


E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank