---

Scientology Crime Syndicate

24 Oct 2000

dominion@take_this_out.pdq.net

On Mon, 23 Oct 2000 21:50:07 GMT, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off wrote:

Really? Are you another "Great Debater"? Sure sounds like you have some of the techniques mastered.

Dr Luara on:

Homosexuality being destructive

I personally have been agonizing over this. I've always told people, who opposed homosexuality, that they were homophobic, bad, bigoted and idiotic. I was wrong. It is destructive - 13 August 1998

Biological error

I'm sorry, hear it one more time perfectly clearly: If you're gay or a lesbian, it's a biological error that inhibits you from relating normally to the opposite sex. The fact that you are intelligent, creative and valuable is all true. The error is in your inability to relate sexually intimately, in a loving way to a member of the opposite sex ≠ it is a biological error. - 8 December 1998

Discrimination

In other words, AB 222 (California Assembly Bill 222) suggested that sexual orientation discrimination was the same and equal to racial and gender discrimination? How can that be? A behavior, the same as a born gender and a born race? I never understood that anyway - 3 June 1999

The proposal to stop Gay discrimination in California public schools The concern of a lot of these bills is that they take sexual, deviant behavior into schools from kindergarten up and say it's normal and equivalent to heterosexual [behavior], which sort of undermines the basic foundation of civilization.... - 9 June 1999

Equal rights for Gays

Rights. RIGHTS! RIGHTS? For sexual deviants... sexual behavior there are now rights. That's what I'm worried about with the pedophilia and the bestiality and the sadomasochism and the cross-dressing. Is this all going to be "rights" too, to deviant sexual behavior? It's deviant sexual behavior. Why does deviant sexual behavior get rights? Don't understand that to start out with. - 9 June 1999

President Clinton's Gay pride proclamation

He wants us to celebrate that it is a sad state of affairs, in my opinion - that there are some people who cannot or will not commune with members of the opposite sex in an intimate way and be married and make children in families. That men have to have sex with men is not something to celebrate. It's a sadness. - 22 June 1999

Gay parenting

You're not going to fight to make sure that homosexuals and lesbians can't adopt children from birth who can go to heterosexual families, so they will be intentionally robbed of a father or a mother on purpose in spite of all the psychological and sociological literature? You're going to stand by and let this happen, just go to work and put gas in your car today? Don't you care about children? - 22 June 1999

Biological error (revisited)

But biologically it is clearly an error. What causes the error, I canít argue about. A lot of professionals in the field believe it is psycho-social. - 24 August 1999

The Vermont same-sex partners rights decision

How about...you tell me if two men can be sanctified and legalized in this country as marriage, then what is your logical or justifiable reason to exclude adult incest? A man and a woman, consensual, twenty-five years old, who are brother and sister, should not be discriminated against because they have a genetic relationship. - 21 December 1999

Diversity

All diversity is not good. Simply because it is diversity doesn't make it good - except for the left-wing liberals. - 6 March 2000

Biological error (revisited again)

What I did say is that when an individual is not so drawn to a member of the opposite sex, in biology, thatís some kind of error. - 15 August 2000

AIDS funding

"I'm making an announcement: Not one penny will I give to AIDS anything as long as [public sex is allowed in gay bathhouses]. Not cent one. It's a preventable disease. If you don't want to prevent it, I don't want to pay for it."

Ok Bob, really now. Just what is it you would like refuted??

---
Dominion

Debate. Create. Participate.

The Skeptical_Wiki

http://www.wikiweb.com/~Skeptical_Wiki

Dubitando ad veritatem venimus.
By doubting we come to the truth

---

The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank