---

Alert to all wogs (R)! Don't be a duck in a pond! Shoot back!

18 Mar 2002

Gerry Armstrong <gerryarmstrong@telus.net>

This is an alert to all wogs . Scientologists are also urged to read this material and take it to heart. Wogs should web it if you can, and disseminate it on every relevant communication line you have available to you.

Very recently, in International Scientology News 20 2002 CSI, Scientology cult leader David Miscavige stated to the world:

[Quote]

2001 saw us shooting down SPs like 'ducks in a pond.'

[End Quote]

Miscavige's image of murdering wogs is perfectly clear. When he says, however, that Scientologists have been killing these wogs by shooting them down, it is unclear if they're actually being shot by firearms, or if they're being murdered by some other method.

The wogs the Miscavige cult has targeted recently may very possibly have been shot, since Miscavige is a gun nut, and it is well known that Scientology has caches of firearms, at least at its headquarters properties. And the wogs may possibly be reacting to being shot down 'like ducks in a pond,' which is very unlike wogs , because Miscavige's Scientologist shooters are using silencers.

It is abundantly clear that Miscavige is talking about murdering wogs , since he identifies the Scientology cult's targets as "SPs," and he would never publicly refer to Scientologists as SPs. He almost certainly has Scientologists shot down, and that would undoubtedly be more like shooting down ducks in a pond than shooting wogs would be, but Miscavige would never call them SPs publicly.

It is also absolutely clear that when Miscavige talks of shooting wog SPs or targeting wogs SPs for being shot, whether like ducks in a pond or not, he really is not talking about actual wog SPs at all. That is just a cover or excuse for targeting or murdering wogs who aren't even slightly suppressive, but who are among the most decent, caring, loving wogs on the planet.

Scientologists never actually target wogs who fit their cult's definition of "SP," people comprising the most evil 2 1/2 percent of the wog population. Scientologists only targets wogs who are not suppressive, good people with good families, good friends, good careers, good minds, good hearts and good lives. These are the people Scientologists seek to destroy, and who Miscavige brags about shooting down like ducks in a pond.

Miscavige's apparently insane hubris in announcing that this past year he'd been having wogs shot down like ducks in a pond brought me to remember this letter which Hubbard wrote from Spain in 1953, and that brought me to track down, from a dear old friend a copy which follows.

I think it is an important letter because, among other things, it shows, to anyone with a clue to rub together, that at that time Hubbard was completely mad. And highly dangerous. Miscavige is also highly dangerous. We wogs who oppose Scientology madness and danger are in great danger at this time.

Is Miscavige unconcerned about announcing that they're shooting down the wogs who oppose them like ducks in a pond, just because with device number five it really is like shooting ducks in a pond? They have the lawyers. They have the tan briefcases. They have Command Intention.

[Quote]

July 19-53

Spain

Dear Helen -

You have many times mentioned the "electronics eager beavers" around there.

Well, here is a _ _vital _ _ project for advanced research which I _must_ have.

I have tried three times to get this gadget, simple as it is, and three times the person who engaged upon it suddenly decided it was "too terribly deadly" and although they had it almost complete, stopped work on it in something like horror.

War, according to Klausewitz, is the art of inducing "a more agreeable and reasonable frame of mind in an adversary." Our adversary, insanity, is far from reasonable. I have been licking the problem of insanity with mechanical _aids_. You may have wondered _why_ I keep telling auditors to lay off the insane - It is because it is too tough on the auditor when I have, in development stage, five mechanical aids which, anyone of them, lick the problem without destroying the person, the last being the favored method today in psychiatry. If I come over for a series of lectures, I will want to have these five mechanical aids to demonstrate and a means to manufacture them to hand. We can "take Richmond" if I can put in psychiatric use, these simple aids.

They are four of them, nothing to build. The fifth is another matter. It is the fifth we want to finish this step of the "mechanical aids project". If we spring any of this before I can demonstrate and we can manufacture and supply, the squirrels will ruin the entire show with unworkable gimmicks re Howes. So this is secret. It is also secret that the 5th aid, the one requested here, will never be released generally and must remain secret. The other four are simplicity. One is reduction of charge by grounding.

Two is release of charge by double terminaling with mirrors. Three is reduction of charge with B1 and protein in quantity (already tested, never understood by our "public"). Four is attention shifting by mechanical aid.

Five is the induction in the insane of instantaneous hypnosis and theta clearing while tranced - _very_ effective but very hard to do without a mechanical aid. The work I am doing here is assisted by the fact that in Spain I have an unlimited freedom to practice on the insane.

There are so _many_ insane in the US and so _few_ auditors that only mechanical aids _plus_ group processing, can get us over this hump. We really can solve insanity in the U.S. but not with individual auditing at 2 or 3 weeks per insane patient. They go crazy faster than we can audit.

The 5th aid uses a type of hypnosis not generally known. It is physical hypnosis. The (thetan) agrees with the body. The body is pretty crazy. When the thetan agrees too much thetan + body are crazy = insanity. The body goes easily into a somnolence. If the body can be made not to interfere for a short time, the (thetan) can be exteriorized and worked. Drugs and shock hit the (thetan) too as these connect with the brain control centers. The body can be hypnotized via the _vagus_ nerve in the stomach. By creating a regulated series of impacts against this nerve, it may be possible to hypnotize the body and leave the (thetan) fairly free in many cases.

In order to accomplish this the device must not be suspected. Either by sanitarium officials or the insane.

The device _must_ be packaged in a very ordinary tan brief case of the type lawyers use and which has yet enough room to permit papers being carried in it, taken out and put in casually before witnesses. The "trigger" must be part of the lock of the case so that it can be turned on and off at will.

The device itself is a super-sonic, alternately directed and dispersed, beam, dry battery operated, without recoil upwards or backwards against the user.

The device must not make audible noises or howls. It must, to the human ear, be silent. It must deliver an impact of considerable force on a small target with a concentrated beam. This beam must go on and off and alternate with a dispersed but directed beam on a slighter greater area target. At five feet the beam should strike a target about 2" in diameter. The second beam should strike a target, same direction and area, about 8" or 10" in diameter.

The number of times the beams strike, each, a minute, should be variable from 12 to 84 at the control of the operator. He could then set the machine for 12 narrow beams per minute and increase it to 84 narrow beams per minute. Narrow beams always followed by broad beams without variation and control. (These numbers approximate the breathing and heart rate; by bringing these into outward control, hypnotism is induced.)

The force of impact of the beams should be as great as possible. They should emanate from one of the narrow ends of the brief case, horizontally.

The Japanese have registered many patents on such devices and have even, I think, killed a goat with one at 300 yards. The device is not, however, practical as a weapon as it uses too much time. If the feeling that such a device as #5, being deadly, should not be built or placed in anyones hands deters its construction, recall that it already exists and could be built for murderous purposes by anyone.

I want to be able to walk into a sanitorium, confront an insane patient, quiet him in a few seconds, exteriorize him, change his mind, wake him up physically. And I want a few auditors to be able to do it. This would mean the immediate end of psychiatric resistance to Scientology. Then we would take aids 1 to 4 and demonstrate and widely install them.

I need then, here, soon, the 5th aid. I am testing and improving the others. Only good engineering can build # 5. Can you have it built and airfreighted to me quickly. I need it.

The Soundscriber came through fine and is working well, thanks to you -

I am organizing material for 2 more large issues in the Journal. I expect you will get out filler issues on their scheduled dates.

All is well here.

My love to you both -

<signature Ron

On shipping #5, give it a spurious use for the benefit of customs here. Send the instructions by letter, not with machine.

[End Quote]

Obviously I'm posting the letter in its entirely. I don't know if it has ever been webbed, but I couldn't find it. As I said, I recently received it from an old friend, whose name is not important. I believe it to be accurate in every detail. The language is authentic Hubbard, so I do not think Scientology will deny its authenticity.

I am also posting this letter in its entirety because I believe that it constitutes an urgently needed public warning which can only be conveyed by the letter in its entirety. I believe that the menace reflected in this letter dwarfs and trumps any and all copyright infringement considerations. I think it is important that the Miscavige admission and the Hubbard letter be sent to government, the media, courts, and to every wog with eyes to see.

I think there is no disagreement that Hubbard was Spain during the period in which the letter indicates it was written, July, 1953. Helen is, of course, Helen O'Brien, in Philadelphia, PA, also famous because Hubbard wrote his famous "religion angle" letter to her. I met Helen in LA in 1981, interviewed her for the Hubbard biography, and ended up purchasing all her old documents for the cult.

Howes is almost certainly Ron Howes with his Institute of Humanics. I don't have a way of checking if by 1953 the Japanese registered any, let alone many, patents on briefcase sized goat death ray weapons. This could be a Red Hubbard herring. That he urges that the device be built just because it could be built for murderous purposes by anyone is no red herring, however.

Hubbard's guilty knowledge fills the letter. His insistence upon utter secrecy in the construction and use of this deadly weapon is clear, and very base. He was going to secretly assault people with goat death rays, without the people, all wogs of course, or even officials around them, ever finding out they were being assaulted. Hubbard knew Device No. 5 was a weapon and wanted a "spurious use for the benefit of customs." He wanted this weapon for shooting down wogs like ducks in a pond.

2002 Gerry Armstrong

-- Listen to Scientology's insane "International President" nutter ranting insanely at http://www.linkline.com/personal/frice When scientologists are involved it raises the chances of business fraud by about 100 fold. -- Human Rights activist Mr. Keith Henson "Commodore Rimjob" available http://crimjob.tripod.com

---

The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Any text written by other authors which may be quoted in part or in full within this exposure of the Scientology cult is provided according to U. S. Code Title 17 "Fair Use" dictates which may be reviewed at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html If you're an author of an article and do not wish to allow it to be mirrored or otherwise provided on The Skeptic Tank web site, let us know and it will be removed fairly promptly.


Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank