
Helnwein in Court 3/7
From
http://members.tripod.com/German_Scn_News/has07.htm
Helnwein in Court - 1991 to 1997 - continued
Helnwein & Scientology, Lies & Treason by Peter Reichelt, 1997 - Page 329
A Synopsis of all the Helnwein Legal Proceedings
Many other legal proceedings were to follow. A summary of
cases is presented, insofar as it is known, of the court
proceedings initiated by Gottfried Helnwein in Germany
between 1991 and 1996 which contain Helnwein's sworn
affirmations:
1. Saarbruecken State Court - file number: unknown, 1994,
Gottfried Helnwein vs. "Verein fuer die Interessen
tyrannisierter Mitmenschen e.V." and the "Verein fuer
Friedenserziehung im Saarland e.V."
On March 21, 1994 Gottfried used his "written, sworn
affirmation" to apply for a temporary restraining order. On
March 31, 1994 he withdrew his application because the
court will not decide without an oral hearing.
Suspicion of false sworn affirmation by Gottfried Helnwein
and trial fraud, because Helnwein is, in fact, a "Class IV
Auditor."
2. Bonn State Court - file number: unknown, 1994,
defendants same as above, reason same as above.
On April 20, 1994 Helnwein managed a "TRO" without an
oral hearing. On July 20, 1994 Helnwein withdrew the reason
for the "TRO" and waived rights on the order. In both
proceedings, Gottfried submitted his sworn affirmation as a
basis of credibility. In his TRO of March 14, 1994, he stated,
among other things, " ... At no point in time was I or am I a
'Class IV Auditor...'. Proof: basis of a decision of the
Frankfurt Superior State Court on accounts of Gunther
Traeger, Adelheid Rech-Gesche, the Director of the
Scientology Celebrity Center in Duesseldorf, a statement by
the Scientology Organization, et al.
Suspicion of false sworn affirmation by Gottfried Helnwein
and trial fraud, because Helnwein is a "Class IV Auditor."
3. Frankfurt am Main State Court. file number: 2/3 O 507 /
94, 1994, appealed by the accused parties to
4. Frankfurt am Main Superior State Court. file number: 16 U
163 / 95 1995, defendants same as numbers 1 and 2 - same
facts and continuation of the proceedings under 1 and 2.
Regarding 3 and 4, suspicion of trial fraud (process costs
according to who won, etc...) by Gottfried Helnwein,
because Helnwein, according to a statement by the
Scientology Organization is a "Class IV Auditor," and
regarding 4, "destructive gossip" or "libel"
Helnwein & Scientology, Lies & Treason by Peter Reichelt, 1997 - Page 330
to the detriment of the judge of the 16th appeals chamber of
Frankfurt am Main Superior State Court for his public, verbal
description of this judge as a "Nazi judge," among other
things.
5. Cologne State Court, file number: 28 O 514 / 92 1992,
Gottfried and Renate Helnwein vs PRINZ Verlag GmbH, u.a.
Application for a temporary restraining order of October 9,
1992 with the sworn affirmation - attachment 4 - by Gottfried
Helnwein of October 9, 1992. Items 1 and 2 of the
affirmation are false, because Helnwein, together with his
wife, donated $80,000 to the War Chest of the
Scientologists. Helnwein is an "Operating Thetan." Cologne
State Court made the decision of October 9, 1992 based on
Helnwein's false affirmation. Suspicion of false sworn
affirmation by Gottfried Helnwein and trial fraud, because
Helnwein and his wife have been "Patrons" since 1988 and
therefore have together "donated" min. $80,000. Besides
that, Helnwein has been an "Operating Thetan" since 1974.
6. Heilbronn State Court, file number: 5 O 2548 / 92, 1992,
Gottfried Helnwein vs. Hans-Gerold Goebbel and Junge
Union Baden W.
On October 11, 1992 application for "TRO" with sworn
affirmation by Helnwein of October 9, 1992 - attachment 6 -
permitted by the court based on credibility of Helnwein
because of his oath. Temp. restraining order decided without
oral hearing in favor of Helnwein on October 12, 1992.
Attachment 6 submitted for the TRO is false in the following
items, "I do not have ... an active membership ... in
Scientology." That is false. Helnwein has been a member of
the Scientology Organization without break since 1972.
Indeed, Helnwein was still being described on January 14,
1997 by the Scientology Organization as a persecuted
Scientologist. There is no question of there having been a
break in membership. The decision was rendered legally
effective by the closing statement. Suspicion of false sworn
affirmation and trial fraud.
7. Koblenz State Court, file number: 1.O.558 / 91 1991,
Gottfried Helnwein vs. Holger Brosius
On November 13, 1991, Helnwein submitted the application
for a "TRO" and justified it by means of his sworn affirmation
of the same day. Without oral hearing on November 14,
1991, the court issued the following temporary order: the
following assertion will be avoided: "recruitment attempts by
the Scientology Church have taken place on the Burgbrohl of
painter Helnwein
Helnwein & Scientology, Lies & Treason by Peter Reichelt, 1997 - Page 331
or attempts to build a sect establishment in its vicinity have
been going on for a long time." Nevertheless, both of those
statement correspond to fact. Therefore Helnwein's sworn
affirmation is false. Suspicion of false sworn affirmation and
trial fraud.
8. Koblenz State Court file number: 2.O.502 / 91 1991
Gottfried Helnwein vs. Verlag Gruner and Jahr AG and Co.
On November 15, 1991, Helnwein filed the same application
as he did under item 7. He then established credibility, in turn,
by means of a TRO. On November 19, 1991, the court
decided in favor of Helnwein's TRO. This "sworn statement"
- attachment 5 - is also false in the following points: "The
building in "Eifel" in which I reside with my family is used
exclusively as a paint and photo studio. ... It is not used to
spread the teachings of any kind of religious society or sect.
... So the assertion that I would want to proselytize to the
inhabitants of Brohl Valley is pure nonsense and without any
foundation. ... No religious society ... or sect ... is authorized
by me to use a picture of my person, art work ... statements
or text for advertising purposes. ..." Exactly the reverse is
true. Recruitment for Scientology has been done in the castle
under Helnwein's direction since 1985. A Scientology
Celebrity Center was established in Burgbrohl the beginning
of 1985. Countless Scientology publications have been
advertising in detail with Helnwein's statements, art work,
interviews, photos, etc. from 1974 until today! Suspicion of
submitting a false sworn affirmation and trial fraud by
Gottfried Helnwein.
9. Koblenz State Court file number: 1 O 341 / 91 1991
Gottfried Helnwein vs Pastor Keden, Reverend Jankowski
and Brohltal Verlag.
On June 28, 1991, Helnwein filed an application for a
temporary restraining order. On July 11, 1991, the parties to
the procedure reached a partial settlement. The Brohltal
Verlag publishing company was forbidden to again make
three specified assertions. However, according to statements
by various people close to Helnwein, points 1 and 2 as
specified were true. Helnwein again based the credibility of
his statement on a TRO. Suspicion of false sworn affirmation
and trial fraud by Gottfried Helnwein.
This proceeding was the start of a large number of
proceedings in which Helnwein began to whitewash his
Scientology membership under all circumstances.
Helnwein & Scientology, Lies & Treason by Peter Reichelt, 1997 - Page 332
In 1988, the Helnwein couple began "auditing" training
for "Class 4 Auditors" in "Celebrity Center Duesseldorf -
City Office Burgbrohl"
(from: "The Auditor" 235, p. 5, 1988)
----------------------------------------------------
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
German_Scn_News <german_scn_news@hotmail.com>
5 Feb 2000
This url has LOTS of graphics which are scans of the original documentation
German Scientology News
Unofficial translations from German-speaking countries
Index/link to over 800 articles -
http://cisar.org/trnmenu.htm
Informational publications -
http://members.tripod.com/German_Scn_News
For non-commercial use only Have a nice day

The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.