
TORONTO: Libel Suit- First Salvo -Demand for Apology
Toronto June 29, 2000
The following individuals received the letter appended below by
courier on Friday June 30, 2000.
Liz Kristiansen
J.G. Layton
Betty Misener
Grahame F. Potter
A. Renault
David Stokes
********************************************
William G. Hagglund
C/O
VIA COURIER
June 29, 2000.
Mx. Xxx
Dear Mx Xxxxxx,
My wife and I have forwarded a copy of your defamatory letter of April
xx, 2000 to our Solicitors.
We understand Mr. Eric Roher of Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, who
represents the Toronto Board of Education, has already reprimanded you
for your conduct.
*The patently false allegations or innuendoes you made were one or
more of the following:*
With respect to Jennifer Hagglund:
Is too deficient in character to be a teacher.
With respect to Gregg Hagglund:
Distributes hate literature or hate propaganda.
Innuendo:
It is the obligation of those who make such accusations to have made
at least some reasonable effort to establish the veracity of such
statements. Failure to do so is not exculpatory in the event such
statements prove false and legal action is prosecuted against those
publishing the libel.
There is no evidence whatsoever to "support the serious allegations
made by you. There is absolutely no evidence of professional
misconduct, incapacity or incompetence on the part of Ms. Hagglund."
There is also no evidence whatsoever to support the serious
allegations or innuendoes made by you about my conduct or myself.
The facts of the matter are that contrary opinion is neither
harassment nor a hate crime. My activities of criticizing Scientology
management, policies and 'technologies' are Charter Protected Freedom
of Expression. The Toronto Hate Crimes Unit informed Mr. Al Buttnor,
DSA, of that fact in late 1997 or early 1998. Detective Bone (7287) of
52 Division also informed Mr. Buttnor similarly in 1999. Detective
Kijewski (5894), of the HCU was quoted in the Globe and Mail on
February 24, 1999 as concurring, in particular, of my right to
demonstrate and voice contrary opinion or reveal embarrassing fact.
Detective Kijewski would also confirm the police have never issued a
warning nor made a request or demand for me to remove any photograph
of anyone from any website I have been responsible for.
Additionally the Toronto police Department do not ignore individuals
or groups who commit hate crimes. This may be confirmed with a simple
phone call to the HCU.
" In all the circumstances, the statements contained in your letter
are not only unfounded, but are also completely inappropriate" and
recklessly inaccurate.
*Such statements, if not recanted by the author will definitely be
subject to legal measures.*
Your allegations and innuendos in respect of my wife Ms. Hagglund and
myself constitute a form of defamation in our opinion and in the
opinion of others. "The comments that you made demonstrated either a
wilful intent to bring prejudice to Ms. Hagglund or callous disregard
for her professional reputation."
Equally so have you sought to bring prejudice upon my wife by
association with acts by myself, which you allege or imply, are
illegal. Since you either know these serious allegations or
implications to be false or could easily independently determine them
to be so, the burden falls upon you to be held responsible for the
legal consequences of publishing such libel.
It is very apparent you have very little to gain and much to lose by
participating in a malicious libel campaign orchestrated for the
benefit of the Church of Scientology.
You should note the Supreme Court has upheld the Criminal Code in
respect to the crime of Criminal Libel. " The Court held that
"perpetrators who wilfully and knowingly publish lies deserve to be
punished for their grievous misconduct." The principal object of the
criminal law is the recognition of society's abhorrence of a criminal
act and the punishment of criminal behaviour. Civil law has as its
main goal compensation through awards of damages. Further, the Court
said, a civil action will have little, if any, deterrent effect on
impecunious defendants."
The recent victory by Mrs. Bonnie Woods in her libel suit against
individuals and Scientology in Great Britain should clearly indicate
to you how perilous your position is. The circumstances of her suit
are nearly enough identical to the instant matter as to serve as a
template for the course of action my wife and I are considering.
Our Solicitors, thanks in part to Mr. Minton and the LMT, will have
the same access, or greater, as Ms. Woods did to internal Scientology
policy documentation and expert witnesses.
We are confident any jury would look upon the unchanged and
unapologized for anti-social conduct and internal policy mandates of
Canada's only criminally convicted Church with little sympathy.
Therefore, your abject apology and complete recantation of all
allegations made by you is required, in writing, immediately. This
must be sent within the next 10 business days to all of your previous
recipients. A copy may be sent to my wife and myself care of our
Solicitors. In addition, you are put on notice that you, or anyone
acting in concert with you, are not to have any direct contact with
any member of my family. Any attempt by yourself or anyone you act in
concert with, to deliver direct communications with my family, in any
manner, will be considered as harassment.
Obviously any recantation by yourself will certainly serve your best
interests in any civil or criminal actions, which may ensue. However,
said recantation should not be construed as a release by us of
yourself or others, of legal responsibility, civil or criminal, for
the impact of your initial letter.
In any event, whether you choose to recant or not, and only excepting
your letter of recantation, "you are hereby formally put on notice to
cease and desist immediately from making or circulating, in any manner
whatsoever, any comments, commentary or other information with respect
to" my wife, myself, any member of our family or those we associate
with, especially within our community.
Our current Solicitors address is above.
Sincerely Yours,
William G Hagglund.
*********************************************
Gregg Hagglund SP7
Toronto and Canadian National Picket Reports now at:
<
http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/Spa/8412/toronto/index.html>
"It's interesting that Scientologists cannot seem to differentiate
between: ----individuals: picketing an organization to voice their
opinion on its behavior, and -----an organization: picketing individuals
for voicing their opinion." - M.C.DiPietra
"Give'em hell son." the late M.G.Hagglund
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
Gregg <elrond1@home.com>
Fri, 30 Jun 2000 16:09:58 -0400
12 Hiawatha Rd.,
Toronto, Ontario
M4L 2X8
Layton Creations
128 Manville Rd. Unit 28
Scarborough, Ontario
M1L 4J5
Reliable Promotions
725 Browns Line
Suite 201
Toronto, Ontario
M8W 3V7
Grahame Potter Marketing Inc.
385 Vaughan Road
Toronto, Ontario
M6C 2N8
XL Transcribing & Document Processing Services
1405 Lewisham Drive
Mississauga, Ontario
L5J 3R2
168 Lake Promenade
Etobicoke, Ontario
M8W 1A7
Marks and Ciraco
Barristers, Solicitors
And Trademark Agents
247 North Service Rd. W.,
Suite 101
Oakville Ontario
L6M 3E6
905 844 1604
123 xxx.,
Toronto, Ontario
XxX xXx
Distributes hate literature or hate propaganda.
Is outspoken against your religion.
Assaults your religion.
Is a religious bigot.
Is involved in illegal hate crime activities.
Is involved in religious hatred in general.
Supports anti-religious or anti social activities.
Supports illegal hate crime activities.
Leads a group of hate mongers.
Is a hate monger.
Hates your religion
Assaults your religion.
Attempts to incite hatred against your church.
Is involved in illegal hate crime activities.
Is involved in anti-religious or anti social activities.
Is involved in religious hatred in general.
Yells obscenities in front of the scientology building.
Is a pedophile: Warned by the police to take down pictures of children
from his website.
White Supremacist/Nazi: Is the same as Ernst Zundel.
Pedophilia: Is involved in taking children's pictures for the
Internet.

The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.