From: cep@Apple.COM (Christopher Pettus)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: take the test
Message-ID: <55258@apple.Apple.COM>
Date: 23 Jul 91 17:24:15 GMT
References: <7335@husc6.harvard.edu> <34485@usc.edu> <asbestos.22Jul91.2374@midway.uchicago.edu>
Distribution: alt.religion.scientology
Organization: Uh, can I get back to you on that one?
Lines: 30

In article <asbestos.22Jul91.2374@midway.uchicago.edu> asbestos@midway.uchicago.edu writes: >In article <34485@usc.edu> lfreeman@phad.hsc.usc.edu (Leny Freeman) writes: >>Charles Manson was never a Scientologist. The author of Helter >>skelter admitted that he just added that in there when confronted by > >Manson didn't write Helter Skelter; the Beatles did.

We're not talking about the _song_ Helter Skelter, we're talking about the book, _Helter Skelter_, about the Manson killings. Do you read these posts before replying?

>>church attorneys. Also OT-9 hasn't even been released yet and OT-8 > >Released? What the fuck? You mean you have new, up-to-date versions of >moral perfection? > >Geez. Next you'll be telling me there are unannounced bugfix >releases, OT-8A, OT-8B, etc., like Microsoft does.

I just finished wading through a whole collection of posts from you, and here's some advice: With enemies like this, the Church doesn't need friends. You might try taking a bit more analytical approach if you want to find problems with Scientology (lord knows, they're there), or you'll find people who might otherwise agree with you defending the Church because your approach is so offensive. -- -- Christophe

"Oh, so you're going to kill me! What a finely-tuned response to the situation!"

The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank