From: lindsay+@cs.cmu.edu (Donald Lindsay)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: E-Meter
Message-ID: <14052@pt.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: 28 Jul 91 17:14:33 GMT
References: <17250@life.ai.mit.edu>
Distribution: alt.religion.scientology
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
Lines: 28
Nntp-Posting-Host: gandalf.cs.cmu.edu

In article <17250@life.ai.mit.edu> whatis@wookumz.gnu.ai.mit.edu (....What Is?....) writes: >I wouldn't want to build my own E-Meter! If one faulty component >caused an erratic swing of the needle, which indicates an area of >flat-out insanity, I would be chasing this thread to no avail and >eventually upset my preclear. Thank you very much, but I'd rather buy >a good one and send it in for servicing every year like they >recommend.


Let me guess: it's an expensive servicing.

I can buy an excellent metal detector at Radio Shack for $40. A superb E-Meter, good for years for flawless service, should be similar or a little more - certainly under $120. A workable one should be $15. In both cases, the failure mode should be obvious, not subtle, in which case you **throw it out*** and buy a new one.

(Or buy two and have them vote - sorry, just a little tech joke.)

Since you are posting from MIT, I will assume that you have some brains, and some familiarity with the consumer electronics available in our society. Am I wrong? If yes, I must have missed some major factor: could you tell me what it is? -- Don D.C.Lindsay Carnegie Mellon Robotics Institute

The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank