From: christir@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Christi)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Perfectionism (was Re: L. Ron Hubbard was an egregious sexist.)
Message-ID: <CHRISTIR.91Aug22180557@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
Date: 22 Aug 91 23:05:57 GMT
Article-I.D.: mentor.CHRISTIR.91Aug22180557
References: <17563@life.ai.mit.edu> <19116@scorn.sco.COM>
	<1991Aug20.195201.17119@hellgate.utah.edu> <19188@scorn.sco.COM>
	<1991Aug22.145929.11774@hellgate.utah.edu>
Sender: news@mentor.cc.purdue.edu
Reply-To: christir@mentor.cc.purdue.edu
Organization: Who?  Me?  Organization?
Lines: 35
In-reply-to: sgandy%peruvian.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu's message of 22 Aug 91 20:59:29 GMT

In article <1991Aug22.145929.11774@hellgate.utah.edu> sgandy%peruvian.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Sildem Gandy) writes:

   In article <19188@scorn.sco.COM> jondr@fscott.UUCP (Dances With Voles) writes:

   >If you feel that LRH has helped your life, then that's just great,
   >but spare an hour or two to think about the lives that he has
   >destroyed beyond repair, sometimes accidentally, often
   >deliberately.  Do you really want to associate with that class of
   >person?
   >

   I don't know of anyone who has been harmed by LRH, but I know personally 
   hundreds of people who have received Dianetics and Scientology counselling
   who have rave reviews of it. I am also a trained New Era Dianetics Counselor
   and I know how effective it is.  

gee you don't know of anyone harmed by lrh?  does that also include
indirectly harmed by lrh, or by scientology, etc?

if so, then congratulate yourself.  you are reading an article by one
person harmed by scientology.  i can also point to sources of many
others harmed by scientology or hubbard.

or do you call throwing someone who can't swim into the ocean?

or encouraging someone not to get medical treatment that would save
their lives?

or encouraging the break up of marriages/families, etc?

c.

--