---

Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: ekrem@vlsivie.tuwien.ac.at (Ekrem Saban)
Subject: Re: Snide comments (was Re: Perfectionism)
In-Reply-To: fseipel@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu's message of Wed, 4 Sep 1991 21: 06:10 GMT
Message-ID: <EKREM.91Sep18141447@cuba.vlsivie.tuwien.ac.at>
Sender: news@email.tuwien.ac.at
Nntp-Posting-Host: cuba.vlsivie.tuwien.ac.at
Organization: Vienna University of Technology
References: <1991Sep4.025930.28220@acsu.buffalo.edu>
	<GOEHRING.91Sep4090612@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
	<1991Sep4.144715.4076@milton.u.washington.edu>
	<1991Sep4.210610.13312@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1991 13:14:47 GMT
Lines: 17

In article <1991Sep4.210610.13312@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> fseipel@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Frank E Seipel) writes:

>I suspect you'd find disagreement with this doubt amongst the roughly two >thirds of the world's population that are not "christian". Don't take the >ethnocentric view that the population of the United States is representative >of the rest of the world.

I don't think that was the point. Islam, Judaism, etc, are *ALL* striking contrasts to Scientology.

Does "Scientology" means the "believe" that (todays) science is right, and that scientists are knowing everything best? If so, you are right. But if you mean with this believe in all-known and accepted facts of science, then your statements above are only true with an excistential quantifielr, i.e. instead of *ALL* substitude *SOME*, as I know no contradiction with accepted and no more disputed facts which are in (striking) contrast to Islam.

---
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank