(Holder of the Copyrights and Trademarks of Scientology and Dianetics)

DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE OF 18 Sept 1996

 Copyright © David Alexander, 1999, 2000. All rights reserved.

TO: -ALL SCIENTOLOGISTS

-BROAD PUBLIC ISSUE

FROM: ACTING CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER

1) -to expose crimes and abuses by officials of the Church of Scientology, and to show that those responsible for the crimes and abuses have failed over an extended time to take responsibility for the misdeeds, and have refused, after admonishment, to handle the misdeeds.

2) -to cite Source Policy authorizing another to "take over as a deputy in a crisis not otherwise being handled" (Intro to Scientology Ethics, p201),--as well as other excerpts from "Keeping Scientology Working" Issue 1, Ethics Gradients, and other documents requiring, permitting, and authorizing such crisis intervention.

3) -to initiate actions to intervene and take responsibility for damage done, until the crisis "area" is again stabilized and being handled.

4) -to initiate an ethics process of determining "where we are", to ascertain "that we are", and to renew our sense of "who we really are". Also to resolve any doubts about our purpose, and about Civilization, and to offer an amends to the society for our continued harmfulnesses.

5. -to establish a time to turn the crisis "area" back over to highly trained and qualified personnel to continue toward the stated Aims and Goals of the Church of Scientology--within the guidelines of decency, and in compliance with the agencies of government of its host countries.

THE STATE OF THE CHURCH

ASSURANCES

INJUSTICES, ABUSES, and CRIMES

MISAPPLICATIONS OF THE TECH

IMPERFECT TECHNOLOGY

CRIMINALITY OF THE CHURCH

ETHICS and JUSTICE ACTIONS

PROGRAM

AMNESTY

GLOSSARY

Because of the definition of the "Goal of Scientology" all stats are junior to "number of persons cleared to date". In 46 years less than 50,000 persons have been cleared. That averages about 1000 persons per year (worldwide). That leaves over 5 billion persons to clear. That leaves us 5 million years to reach our goal. There is not the encouragement that our rate is exponential—in 1989 there were about 42,000 clears. So it is a dimin ishing stat (I may be off on this, but performance is still poor and far short of the goal).

If during any year in the last 7 years, each Clear had Cleared one other person, the present stat, "number of persons cleared" would be about 100,000. If it were a condition for a substantial discount on a clear package that a person promise to clear two persons per year, we would reach our goal in about three decades.

If each of us would clear 5 persons each year, we would attain Goal in 13 years. 50,000 would become clear in just over 5 years. We are already that far, so if each of you cleared 5 persons per year, we could attain goal in just over 7 years—by 2004!

Exponential Clearing

(numbers in 1000’s)

SO, here is some insider trading information regarding how our efforts will effect life on Earth.

Farmers’ co-ops would have to audit in shifts so the world can still eat.

An economic committee will have to keep an eye on the economy so that deserted industries don’t cause a collapse.

Based on the current battle plan practices of the church leadership, they have no intention of Clearing the Planet. Is our stated goal merely disinformation? Whom are we seeking to mislead? The leadership apparently have not planned for anything like this. Their battle plan would continue the perennial price increases—based on last week’s stats. The most obvious indicator of the leadership’s cognition of this would be for them to turn loose the control over Scientologists’ every movement. Whole sale Clearing will flourish in a laissez-faire environment.

The leadership are bogged down in the stats of price and production level for the present rate of 5,000,000 years to Clear the Planet. I believe I perceive some insincerity from this compulsion. As you can see the above timetable will fetch incredible incomes even at reduced prices. The only mindset that could become mired in the current level of progress is one of cross-purposes.

The mortal dilemma (reactive mind bank) is one of mistaking the "spiritual universe" for a smug, self-righteous, aberrated perception of the "spiritual universe". The Technology through level VI, is remedial of the causes of aberrations. Specifically, … lucidity (straightwire), integrity (confessional), non-self-righteousness (resolved ser facs), non-compulsiveness (no GPM's), and the resolution of grief and trauma..., these impart healingness, and facilitate enligh tenment--preparing one to successfully pursue immortality. The "State of Clear" is a necessary prerequisite for pursuing immortality. The "un-cleared" aberrations are the reasons that we cannot perceive the spiritual universe. Thus my perception of Scientology (through level VI) as a religious practice.

The Ethics Technology

Scientology Ethics enables one to attain and keep to a course of integrity, affluence, and personal power. When necessary, it assists one to resolve his confusions, betrayals, and crimes, … to determine his allegiances, to make amends when called for, and to literally "cause" others to accept him back after he has reformed himself.

When one is observed applying this Ethics, and presents his self-corrections to others and offers his restitution, it reads like poetry. When a man perceives and considers his outnesses, and then reasons them out, and offers to restore what he has damaged, … he compels others to admire and accept him, and he compels others to strive to be equally ethical.

The goal, "To Clear the Planet", is worthwhile and would ultimately provide immortality for all mankind. This is no longer the sought-for goal, however. The current pursuits include spending millions of dollars to recruit celebrities as "opinion leaders" to influence others to come to the Orgs. This is an action of "Affluence Attainment", described in Scientology Ethics.

Also, you are labeled "Trouble Source-Type G" in this action—claiming that "if you help such and such a case", at great expense, because somebody is rich or influential or the neighbors would be electrified… Ron recommends to "Process only at convenience and usual arrangements. Make no extraordinary effort at the expense of other persons who do want processing for normal reasons. Not one of these arrangements has ever come off successfully as it has the unworthy goal of notori ety, not betterment.—(HCO PL 27 Oct 64).

Compare this to Tom Cruise and John Travolta, where hundreds of thousands of dollars have been spent on them having their own resorts at the Golden Era Productions base—for the purpose of impressing the world with "opinion leaders"—a marketing ploy that puts us in the 5,000,000 year range of reaching our goal. This is also used as David Miscavige’s method to attaining fame. This does an injustice to Cruise and Travolta both.

However, this does not clear the planet. "Exponential Clearing", where each person, when cleared, agrees to clear [four or five] others, is the only method for Clearing the Planet while it will support life. Celebrity-mongering is a smug, self-righteous, and aberrated action that satisfies one’s feelings of self-importance. This imparts "Celebrity" status to church leaders as it gains for them elitism, luxury, and self-importance.

The failure to implement "Exponential Clearing" reveals a grave insincerity on the part of Church Leadership regarding "The Goal of Scientology".

The focus on "show" reveals the insanity of the leaders’ desperate attempts to boost any stat—renaming streets, four walls full of commendations and "keys to the city" which were solicited and paid for by the church, a high stat of "Lawsuits filed" against those you have "groomed" as your enemies. You have the wrong target—look within.

Fourth Dynamic indicators show you are alienating (ARCXing) the planet—the reverse of your goal! Entire countries are banning you from their borders. You are "short-selling" on the international currencies markets to collapse entire countries in your "Operation Paperchase"—implemented by personnel you have planted in the World Bank, and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development

Staff are nattery [bickering].

The military command channels make us controlling and frantic, as we suppress each others’ self-determinism. For whatever stats .they boost, we are a failure at our reason for existence—number of persons cleared.

A superior Ethics technology plus an empty "things-to-do-basket" has made us shaming, blaming, and punishing as we turn inward on ourselves, as in an "auto-immune" syndrome when the body’s defenses attack itself with tumors.

Deciding to be unreasonable has made us unreasonable. Read chapter 3, "On the Death of Consciousness", from Self Analysis, by LRH. Do the following sentence in clay at the Clay Table: "The primary target of the enemies of man, or a man, is his right and ability to reason."

Civilization considers that we believe that we "can do no wrong" (the viewpoint of an SP). Believing that the only wrong we can commit is to fail to close a sale to the person in front of us, leads us to believe that vandalism, rape, and other OSA violences are acceptable behavior—and that we "can do no wrong". There are some uncontested affidavits against church personnel alleging actual cases of rape, murder, orders to others to commit suicide (End Of Cycle Orders), heavy arms cac hes, torture, and many other abusive or criminal acts. These must either be denied, or the formula applied—and the perpetrators turned over.

The fourth dynamic [civilization] are not stupid. They are coming to believe that we are that, plus criminal. This means that for years, someone has been ARCXing [alienating] the field [civilization] against Scientology. It is we who have been demonstrating "not-sane" for the world.

More than any other group, the "Internet" represents the emerging fourth dynamic, without divisive third dynamic focus—and there, The Church of Scientology is the Villain. There are SP’s there, but you see only SP’s. There are certainly no more SP’s than there are people. There are others there who are outraged at the church’s behavior. There are many affidavits on the internet accusing the church of capital crimes—murder, rape, End Of Cycle orders (to commit suicid e), large scale swindle and vandalism, as well as large-scale arms stockpiling. There is no voice of denial from the Church. You have tacitly pleaded guilty to the charges in the presence of the fourth dynamic. These charges must be either exposed as false, or we must apply the formula for the condition. The World is watching, and we have performed poorly, grossly ARCX’ing the fourth dynamic. There is no way to save face except applying our own technology. Only the Liability formula (after applying th e lower formulas) can rally this emergent fourth dynamic to accept us. Those of you who are experienced in applying Liability know how effective it is. We must experience ethics change, and show on the Internet that our tech applies to ourselves as well as others. Properly handled this will cause an insurgence of interest worldwide, and stats will boom as never before. Your Justice/Ethics program is presented elsewhere in this paper. Your response to these orders is crucial. In lieu of your com pliance there can be no alternative but to declare the Church of Scientology to be a suppressive group.

During a court-assigned arbitration which the judge assigned during divorce-court hearings with my ex-wife, several lawyers commented and concurred on the brutal, controlling, confiscating techniques of Scientologists as they tried to show that I should be made to immediately give up large sums for a settlement—before I lose it to the church. This was their origination from a grapevine of legal community experience—I made no origination at all about Scientolo gists. There is extant, in the legal community, an awareness of our aberrations of heavy, fleecing sales efforts. This is the reputation we have established. Nothing in this reputation has been effective on our purpose line—number of persons cleared—a stagnant statistic. This would all be resolved if we ceased to alienate the public and allowed a reputation of what Scientology can do, to sell itself. It will sell itself, want it? Do you believe in Scientology because you have been forced?--or does it impress you on its own merits? Is our method a "coup d’etat" or the granting of beingness and sanity? Is our goal to ARCX the fourth dynamic?

The governments of the world are finding us distasteful, or ordering us out of their lands, or even attacking us. Where is Source Policy now?--are we "pulling this in", or are we "victims"? Our status in Australia, Greece, and Germany can only spread, without drastic changes in our operating policy.

1) I believe in the effectiveness and the helpfulness of returning, and discharging in reverie,

traumatic and grievous memories that cause our fears, aberrations, and unclear thinking.

2. I believe LRH discovered and codified, better than any predecessor, the route back through these aberrative memories, as well as their resolution.

3. I believe LRH’s personal bank situation is irrelevant to the effectiveness of his TECH. Few men can live up to perfection. In other words, I believe Ron’s legacy is The Technology rather than Ron himself. I believe the TECH is to be held as religious without faulting it because of shortcomings of its founder.

4. I believe LRH had shortcomings. I have identified and isolated shortcomings of LRH.

5. I believe Ron’s shortcomings are superfluous to the effectiveness of Scientology (through the state of Clear). I believe the state of Clear should be attained by every individual.

6. I am concerned that OT III postures Scientologists as "anti-Christ". I am concerned that numerous OT V’s exhibit psychoses. I am concerned that OT VIII represents that Ron is God. I have seen enough to convince me that Ron shares in our reactive bank, and that he is not up to the role of God. I see a movement afoot to deify Ron. I observe that this is ARCX’ing (alienating) sensible persons.
7. I understand how you might prefer to secret your views of Christ and allow the mistaken view that you are pro Christ. However this deception can backfire in our Christian society. The Christian’s GPM (duty compulsion) is to destroy the Anti-Christ. Such a deception can pose you as that Anti-Christ. In the presence of such fixated persons, you would do well to own up to your differences with Christians—protected by a society tolerant of opposing viewpoints.

8. I believe that while Scientology has an effective TECHNOLOGY for attaining immortality, Scientologists are devoid of the fourth-dynamic qualities of compassion and other virtues. I have witnessed Scientologists openly expressing repugnance for humility and meekness, and of virtue in general. Compassion is a natual out-working of knowing that you have the correct technology. Your lack of compassion indicates that you have weak certainty that it works. Therefore your arrogance—the opposi te of compassion—betrays your "weakness in items 7, 8, 9, & 10, from KSW #1.

9. Ron exacts heavy loyalties even from neophytes who have not had time or data to satisfy their uncertainties. This is "enforced reality"—called suppressive technique by LRH—and lies smoldering as By-Passed-Charge (resentment), and as an evaluative wrong item. Scientologists have the courage of command channels—like an army. Too many of them do not have the courage of their convictions—their reality has been enforced.
10. I believe that Scientologists are "reality-enforced" beyond their ability to disagree with LRH, or to not accept points they do not understand or agree with. I believe that the Scientologist’s valence is traceable back to what they see as the "winning valence" of LRH.
11. I believe that your clandestine operations, your arms stockpiling, your posture of the "Anti-Christ", your enforced realities, [more] …are causing many Scientologists deep-seated fears of the Church and of the sanity of the present leadership.
12. I believe that the current leadership, following in Ron’s example, is alienating the fourth dynamic—civilization. I observe this can cause great difficulties considering your goals for civilization. I observe that you are carelessly leaving glowing embers that will defeat your purpose of "Clearing the Planet". You have given good people a feeling that they should protect civilization from the Church of Scientology.

Though it is unnecessary, I cite here the authority for this action of "…taking over as a Deputy in a crises". A refusal to comply with my "taking over" will be your representation to the world that you do not apply or abide by Source Policy. It will also mark your demise as you abandon and forfeit "The Goal of Scientology".

AUTHORITY FOR MY ACTIONS:

-Per Policy, "Keeping Scientology Working", Your Incorrect Applications of Tech and Policy which nearly cost a Scientologist his life are [charlatanous] actions.

-Per Policy, "Keeping Scientology Working", Item #8, I am [eliminating] Incorrect Applications.

-Per Policy, "Keeping Scientology Working", Item #10, I am [preventing future] Incorrect Applications.

-Per Policy, "Keeping Scientology Working", I am invalidating you, as lunatics.

-Per Policy, "The Doubt Formula", Step 3 (Intro to Scientology Ethics, p99), I am actively suppressing you.

-Per Scientology Technology, the "PTS/SP Course", I am moving from effect to cause over the church leadership.

-Per Ethics Policy, I am applying "Ethics Gradients" to the leadership and the group (Intro to Scientology Ethics, p157). By this authority I am investigating and correcting you. As you read this I am continuing down the list of gradients.

-Per Policy, "Condition Assignments--Treason Condition" (Intro to Scientology Ethics, p102) You are not currently on post--I am the Church!

-Per Policy, Ron has obligated me to pick-up the highest abandoned post I am aware of, and to assign Treason Condition to the previous duty officer.

-Per Policy, It is a listed crime for me to "Not [take] over as a deputy in a crisis not otherwise being handled".(Intro to Scientology Ethics, p201)

-Per Policy, It is a listed crime for me to "[Permit] a section, unit, department, org, zone or division to collapse.(Intro to Scientology Ethics, p201)

-Per Policy, It is a listed crime for me to "[Condone] circumstances or offenses capable of bringing a course, section, unit, department, org, zone or division to a state of collapse".(Intro to Scientology Ethics, p203)

-Per Policy, It is a listed Suppressive Act to "[to Fail] to strenuously act to clean up an 'Affinity-broken field' [and is] deemed a high crime for an Executive Council."(Intro to Scientology Ethics, p222). For myself and others, I have witnessed the Affinity-broken field for extended periods of time

-Per Policy, Also listed as a Suppressive act is "Refusal to allow staff or public to progress up the [Spiritual Path], or creating blocks on the [Spiritual Path] preventing such progression." (Intro to Scientology Ethics, 212).

I believe that these actions will cause "Ethics Change" in the most hardened of Church Staff. Failing this, I will continue down the list of "Ethics Gradients"—on to declaring many among staff as "Suppressive Persons", even to "Expulsion".

Progress toward our goal is senior to all other stats. The priority is to Clear the planet. The idea that 1/3 of us will have high stats for controllingness (admin), and 1/3 of us will have high stats for invalidating (ethics), and the other 1/3 of us (the auditors) will shoulder the blame of anemic stats of "50,000 Clears in 46 years" toward our goal of Clearing the planet is a misapplication of ethics and admin tech. This approach aberrates 2/3 of us while 1/3 of us earns the keep for the others. I shall initiate "Exponential Clearing" to attain our goal within several years.

As I grew up, I had all the opportunities to learn or discover everything that Ron devised. I missed it completely! I was totally clueless! I don’t consider myself capable of making changes in this "workable" Technology. I don’t dare. I am in agreement with the importance of maintaining the workability of the Tech. I am committed to the preservation of the Tech as it stands.

I obviously consider myself capable of catching gross outnesses that others have missed. However, I am grossly unhatted for long-term operation of the church. I seek and encourage nominations for new leadership personnel for Int Management, and other positions.

David Alexander, HDA, ISE, SS II, BSM

ACTING CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER

1) In the fall of 1991 after I received a large sum of money for damages in a fall from a faulty ladder, a "Commando Sales Team" ("a special sales team, in addition to regular sales personnel, engaged solely in the promotion and sales of one particular campaign"—L Ron Hubbard, Modern Management Technology Defined, p 90), came to Dallas from across the nation and literally swarmed over me, viciously competing with each other for the bounty. Only two weeks earlier, Scientologists we re calling me a "freeloader" trying to collect money from me for training I had been awarded by church policy when I was a staffmember. A highly trained saleswoman, Barbara Dews, came from the Flag land base in Clearwater, Florida. John Futris came from the NorthEast to sell me an Elite membership in the The International Association of Scientologists for $40,000.00. With him was Lisa Hunter from Author Services, Inc (recent name change to "Church of Religious Technology"). Lisa told me of a top secret, impending press release (unsolicited), then told me it was a "slip" and that I would have to sign a $50,000 bond to pay if I further "slipped" the information. Lisa also wanted to sell me $60,000.00 worth of leather-bound Scientology books which would be donated to each U. S. Congressman--inscribed with someone else’s name as the donor. John and Lisa came to my apartment and stayed all night, over my protest for them to leave. They stayed until I wrote a check for $40,000.00, at 6:30 am. Thomas Self of the Dallas Church wrote a report on them disclosing that they were following "Command Intention" from International Mgt (Church of Scientology International--the Mother Church).

Each Scientologist who has made capital payments to the church is familiar with the drastic counter-measures leveled at church members who are uncooperative with the church and understand how impotent church members can be made to feel when trying to refuse hours-long sales efforts from top management. From the time you enter Scientology, you are subjected to definitions of "evil persons" who oppose the church, and you are witness to "so-and-so" who was expelled as "evil and psychotic", and is no longer allowed to receive the Church’s services. The pressures of church ostracism, threatened and actual, are equivalent to public social disgrace among your peers, branding one as evil and psychotic. Scientologists are constantly hammered and conditioned by staff quoting L. Ron Hubbard’s most belligerent Policies which shame and blame parishioners who do not contribute greatly, and those who could dare to stop payment on a check, and those who are "evil" enough to d emand a refund or to report the church’s crimes to the authorities.

The following morning, after I reflected on what had happened, this action under duress, of giving away my wealth which should have provided a home for my children, and the repair and recovery of my crippled feet...I placed stop-payment orders on a quarter of a million dollars worth of checks at my bank. After seeing how susceptible I was to manipulation by the church, I decided to invest the money in a long-term investment so it would not be available for manipulation. I’m not a sophisticated inve stor and in my haste I made a bad investment and lost it all. All I had left were the homefurnishings I had bought for the enrichment of my family, and my Scientology library which cost about $55,000.00.

2. Also during this time I met Maya B_______, with whom I became engaged. I introduced her into the Church and she took to the philosophy. During the summer of 1992, Maya expressed to me an interest in having other sexual partners. I tried to explain my view that such a divided loyalty would dissolve allegiances that should remain intact in a marriage—as well as endangering a couple with disease. I had spent considerable time committing to Maya, and before dissolving the engagement outright, I decided to learn whether this were important to her or was just a passing notion. I tried to recruit the church to impress on her the threats from infidelity, and to determine whether this were actually important to her. The church demonstrated no interest in this.

Throughout August, 1992, I made numerous efforts to get help from the Church in handling Maya's 2D outnesses. I sought Ron's advice, in tech and policy, to show Maya. To my disappointment the policy "2nd Dynamic Rules" seemed to say to practice your sex life anyway you please. I felt certain that Ron had more to say than this. I actually learned that this is about the extent of the tech on sex. On approximately August 4, I asked for a cycle with the Ethics Officer. I was routed to Colleen Yeary , a public, OT 7 I believe, who holds the post of Public Ethics Officer. I told Colleen about the unusual partnerships Maya was requesting. Colleen smiled and turned red in the face. I had no trouble understanding this cycle could cause some embarrassment so I dismissed this and continued. I pointed out to Colleen that several sources besides Maya indicated that personal sex practice in Europe was very different and even permissive. I was trying to determine whether a person from such a culture could f eel 'sanctioned' by their society and thus feel moral about this sexual viewpoint without feeling ethical impingement(like a "clear cannibal"). I realized Maya had gotten me into deliberating my own personal ethics and it was rattling me, and I knew it. I was desparately trying to get someone in my church to point and say, for Maya and myself, "Here's what's proper and here's why". I got no help from Colleen. She had been growing uneasy and even angry. I asked her, "Have I done something to offend you? ". She answered forcefully, "No". I began to believe I had missed a withhold on Colleen. She walked me to the church library and told me to read the policy "Second Dynamic Rules". I did so and pointed out to her that it gave no advice and practically said to do whatever you want to do. Colleen said loudly, "If you weren't so out-ethics on the second dynamic you would understand what [the policy] was trying to say". There were several people (whom I knew well) in the Qual library, and I was becoming an noyed by this invalidation. I told Colleen, "I want you to confine this cycle to a small room." We went back to the original room. Colleen was still acting angrily and, I think, nattery. At this point my strongest interest was to gracefully end this squirrel cycle and get the hell away from her. I told Colleen I would seriously consider what she had told me, and thanked her and left.

Had Maya found no Ally (for a computation) to validate her sickness and to paint me as an aggressor, she could have held the focus on her overts long enough to have some permanent wins. As it turned out she found plenty of Ally at the Org (unbeknownst to me until the following March)! On Sunday 23 Aug, Maya, probably on course that day, evidently told Colleen Yeary (who had exhibited missed withhold phenomenon and BPC with me three weeks earlier) some version of our relationship. I believe Maya ga ve only verbal data. To date, no written data from Maya has been admitted. Colleen did a write-up on this meeting and advised Maya to take a motel room and hide from me because I was dangerous and psychotic. Maya confirmed these instructions to me a week later (30 Aug). This action fits the definition of third party action. At some point, Ann Laws, DSA, was called into this, and possibly Cathy Hebert, HES (who had given me dishonest stats for my doubt formula three years earlier). An investigation sh ould be made to determine just which of these three participated in the third party. Eventually all three were to participate. I believe it becomes obvious from later circumstances that Maya bent someone's ear (s) on this day, or else these three terminals arrived at some Third Partied assessment of their own, or perhaps all who were harboring O/W's clucked up a very gratifying assessment. In some form, a decision was made at this time: David must pay... (for?).

2. On August 23, 1992, the "ethics officer" (Colleen Neary), and the "Intelligence officer" (Ann Laws), at the Dallas Church, slandered me to my fiance, Maya Bednarczyk, successfully breaking up our engagement..

They instructed her to take a hotel room so I could not locate her, and they "ordered" me not to see her any more. I took extreme exception to this. My decision in reaction to this oppressive action of leaders of the Church of Scientology, was to part with this evil, suppressive group. The church Intelligence Officer is highly trained in role-playing as a victim, in order to depict a parishioner as an aggressor. My attorney later commented on how much of an act she was putting on in order t o appear upset and intimidated. I believe "clucking like a hen" was his discription. In Texas, it is often ruled "justifiable homicide" when a man kills someone who comes between himself and his wife. It is my personal policy to defend my family with my life. A person risks loss of life by attempting to destroy my family. Scientologists have great difficulty understanding my upset at my church breaking up my home. I showed great restraint in the face of this aggressive action from this harmful church and no one was hurt—although the church intelligence officer played the role of victim for evidence on the charges she pressed against me.

Long after I got over the loss of my fiancee, I cannot get over the pain caused by church leaders taking my determinism into their own hands.

3) On August 27, 1992, I had my lawyer deliver a demand to the church for the return of my $100,000.00 that I still had on account. The church Intelligence Officer, Ann Laws, told my lawyer that the church had spent my money and did not have it to return. This is a statutory violation called co-mingling of funds, and completes the definition of this action of the Church of Scientology as "Embezzelment" and "Fraud". For the amount of $100,000.00, it is not only a felony, it is Gr and Larceny. It appeared that someone would go to prison if I prosecuted, so I stopped pursuing it. I thought the money would still be on account as services I could have.

4) Even after deciding not to prosecute them for their "interstate Fraud and Grand Larceny", I found it impossible to be admitted to my church. They made good on their Church Policy threats of reprisals to persons who report their crimes. After my continued efforts to go to church, International personnel from L. A. coerced me to waiver my rights to sue them for their harmful acts, as a prerequisite for returning to church. I signed what they wanted, gladly, so I could get back with Maya, but they still didn’t admit me to church, nor permit Maya and I to talk to each other.

5) The slandering persons never explained why they did it. It was done in such a way as to make me doubt my self-worth and make me examine my self endlessly. Their indication was that I did not deserve my fiance, and did not deserve Scientology. Church terminals never gave me any reason for breaking up my engagement. They came through on their threat of retribution to persons who will report their crimes and seek redress. I was not permitted to return to the church. Abandoned by the group I had trusted exclusive to all others, my reality became transparent. There has never been a time in my life when I was so stopped and isolated and needed spiritual help. Their betrayal left me carrying on dialogues in public places as I tried to sort out what had happened. It scared me as I noticed others observing me during these public dramatizations. At that time I was still of the feeling that Scientology was good. I had brought Maya into the church and had made her into a Scientologist. I had always f elt that other church members admired me for getting her into the church. There were indications that other men at the church had been pursuing her while she and I were still together. Sometimes when I could locate Maya, she seemed to be reluctantly avoiding me. She had obviously been told something very slanderous about me. I was left to examine my actions and motives alone, and because I thought Scientology could not be wrong, I could only conclude the worst things about myself—but all the conc lusions were grounded only in mystery. I sought help from other locations of the church. I petitioned the church in L.A. The International Justice Chief told me to go back to the Dallas Church. They would only tell me how evil I was. Guilliame LeSevre, the Executive Director Int’l, whose specific post it is to answer personal pleas from Scientologists ignored three desparate pleas I sent him. I made several visits to the Austin church to see a "special" terminal there. He could offer no hel p that could get me back into the Dallas church. Three days before the incident with the intelligence officer, Maya told me she loved me and wanted to always be with me. I felt an urgency to have Dallas terminals bring Maya and myself together to decode what had happened. But they would never allow that--either to let me into the church, or to talk to Maya. I experienced great emotional upset from these actions. To this date I cannot understand why persons at my church would have an interest in separat ing us. It is a time of my life I cannot deal with. All through the church, in Dallas, Florida, and Los Angeles, there is wide spread consideration and accusation that I am for an unexplained reason, "evil". I have heard persons who didn’t know me, tell me about an evil person from the Dallas church who goes by the same name as mine. Someone is posting consistent, harmful charges at myself. No one is addressing me regarding any wrongs-done.

6) In January 1993, after several months of concern regarding the injustices (breaking up my home, embezzling my money, ostracizing me from the church, and labeling me as evil), I succumbed to the despair precipitated by believing I might be evil and useless. I attempted suicide. I was taken to a psychiatric court-detention facility. They were willing when I asked them to release me to my church for counseling, but Ann Laws, the church intelligence officer, refused to allow it. One of my former cu stomers was a psychologist. I got him to claim me as his patient, and gain custody. Without his help I would have been institutionalized. There is evidence that the Church Intelligence Officer, Ann Laws, conferred with the chief psychiatrist to have me committed. Ann reported material from my confidential confessional folder to influence him. This abuse of counselor confidence ruins a person’s ability to trust, and is described by Ron Hubbard as the act of a psychotic Socio-Path, and as causing h arm to the "patient". Thus the Church of Scientology is not to be trusted with deep personal problems or confessionals. Ron explains further that anyone who seeks help for his inabilities and abberrations cannot be psychotic. Psychotherapists are licensed and regulated to avoid abuses such as the violation of client/counselor confidence. In the United States, our churches and their counselors are by and large, held accountable for their actions, and cause little harm to their public, without b eing discovered and corrected. How the Church of Scientology gained immunity from government regulation, I don’t understand. Interestingly enough, they seem to be the most defiant "help group" regarding submission to outside controls. Contrastingly, they have a technology that describes the inability to submit to control as a serious mental aberration.

7) In March of 1993, a senior Scientologist in Los Angeles made the "alert" that I had a large sum of money on account and should be handled before I "refunded". Shortly afterward I was asked by "The Commodore’s Messenger", Pam Hubbert, to donate my capital account outright. Frustrated by refusal of Scientologists to honor the $100,000.00 I had paid for services, and having lost all hope of recovering it after the church’s embezzlement, I was told by "The Commodore ’s Messenger", that if I made a donation of the balance of my money on account, the church would forgive me my "crimes" (?), and would allow me back on lines. Torn between indignation and fear of reprisal, I angrily refused to donate my large sums of capital I had on account, as the Commodore’s Messenger requested. I struggled with this for a couple of weeks. My church had labeled me as evil. They were denying me all the services I had paid for, and for several months I had considered thei r suppressive invalidation of my goodness to the point that I had attempted suicide. The church had told me they had already spent my money and could not return it. I was led to believe there was no way to get this money without getting the church in trouble. I was told I was not in good standing, and could not receive services. Unreturnable and unusable, the money was useless just sitting on account. She tagged another Scientology Executive as a "sales" assist who began to call and apply fur ther pressure. After a week of nervous contention about refusing a Commodore’s Messenger, and concern about getting "declared" (excommunicated), and after an orchestrated nationwide effort to bring pressure to bear, I submitted to write-off the money I had on account in Dallas as a donation. But the church has never allowed me back on lines.

This account was to pay for everything I wanted from Scientology--including counseling to become "Clear" of "mental blocks" and aberrations, services for my children, and for my fiance--before Scientologists successfully attacked and destroyed our engagement, repulsing her against Scientology. In the mildest way I know how to put it, The Commodore’s Messenger deceived me, thereby dishonestly obtaining my donation of the capital I had on account. What could I possibly believe abou t the Church of Scientology when the Commodore’s Messenger is dishonest? Later, when Dallas personnel discovered more money I had on account, they debited it as part of the same donation without my permission, a second example of a subterfuge technique of theft by Church of Scientology terminals.

Non-Scientologists should note the concept of "The Commodore’s Messenger". Ron made the statement, "What is said or done to [the Commodore’s Messenger]...is being said or done to the Commodore (Ron himself). This puts an inhibiting effect on one’s ability to speak freely to, or desent, or rebuke "The Commodore’s Messenger".

8) Afterward my self respect and self-confidence were seriously lowered. My business which included persuading my prospects of the usefulness of my services, even while I was introverted and nullified in life, hit bottom. I was unable to earn a living. I had to trade the piano, at great loss, for some rent. Lester Bland, at the Los Angeles church applied strong sales efforts during my trips to Austin, to move to Los Angeles where "my situation could get handled". He gave me assurances t hat my difficulties could get resolved if I moved. After the Church of Scientology would not respond to my appeals in Dallas, my only recourse was to go to L.A. to seek justice. I had to sell the homefurnishings at great loss to afford the move to L.A. Still unable to ply my business trade, and unable to gain employment, I had to sell off my Scientology Library to Scientologists in L.A. for about 12 cents on the dollar. It is a violation of Scientology principles, and of good taste, that the church will not take some responsibility for 1) the loss of my wealth (over $500,000.00), 2) the separation of my family for a period of three years (so far) while my children are growing up (subrogation), 3) mental anguish--to the point of suicide, and 4) productivity losses caused by these years of disability resulting from Church of Scientology abuses, when they had promised me "enhanced ability". A "Flag Banking Officer" at "Flag Land Base" in Florida, Zoltan Bozan, charged that by s topping the checks two years earlier, I "had committed overts of magnitude against Scientology, and must [pay for my crimes]. Now as a senior officer of a senior Org, he made good on the threat by placing a "Flag Order" for "non-clearance for services" on myself as retribution.

9) After I arrived in L.A., in April, 1993, two Scientologists, Julie Nishimuta and Lester Bland from the "American Saint Hill Organization" together told me I had some mistaken information about Scientology and that was the cause of the upset, and that after that was cleared up I could go back to church. Then they told me I should make a contribution of taped lectures to Ron Hubbards office (I had about $12,000.00 more on account at this L.A. church). I bought the $12,000.00 set of tapes for about $8000.00 and donated them to Ron’s office. No other church official would allow that the upset was due to "mistaken information". I was not allowed back into church. For a third time, Scientologists gained a donation by dishonest misrepresentation. I had made the move to L. A. and was committed to trying to resolve this enigma there. I sought an audience with the "Master-at-Arms" at the "American Saint Hill Organization", Ann Garth. Ann was hard-to-get for a fe w days, when I finally got to see her she took on the personality of a scolding mother. She was wholly irrational in her approach to my difficulty. I viewed this as either a refusal to see my viewpoint or as an indication of insanity.

Knowing I wouldn’t have the option of going around her at "Saint Hill", I sought help at another Org. Later I was upbraided for this action, blamingly called "Org-hopping". This term seems to be a manipulative attempt to prevent competition among the Orgs, and has the effect of a monopoly, in that it prevents one from being able to by-pass corrupt or incompetent personnel. I was losing hope that I could find an ethics terminal who wasn’t dedicated to the guilt of persons who seek t heir help.

10) In May, 1993, I appealed to the "Master-at-Arms", Louise Hamre, of a "senior" branch of the Church of Scientology, The Advanced Org of Los Angeles (AOLA), regarding the injustices in Dallas. Although I had asked her for justice, her subsequent actions seemed to be in response to the request, "Will you please give me a spanking?" I spent weeks in her waiting room in order to get action from her. Instead of investigating the Dallas personnel, she investigated me, say ing I would not be permitted back into the Church of Scientology until I handled outstanding financial obligations of mine that she had uncovered, (I was in the process of taking care of these obligations when the church embezzled my money and caused the loss of more money). The vernacular for this is "Kangaroo Court". I was still seriously in need of help. Having given $100,000.00 to the church, and being seriously compromised by difficulties, (for the most part, due to the church’s bungling o r suppression) I couldn’t understand how external obligations should prevent my receiving spiritual help from the church. One more obstacle to my getting back into the Church of Scientology was, I would have to pay the checks to the Church I had stopped a year and a half earlier (about $200,000.00 worth--for which nothing was delivered). Over the last two years I have continued appealing to several top Scientologists including the Chairman of the Board, David Miscavige; the Executive Director Internationa l, Guillaume LeSevre; and the International Justice Chief, Sue Porter. Not one of them has responded to my letters. These persons are now party to the swindling of my family fortune.

11) Upon being requested to provide justice after the attacks and destruction of certain Dallas staff, Louise Hamre, MAA--AOLA, performed a Board of Investigation--on me, and brought up arrearages in financial obligations to non-Scientologists as reasons for not providing justice. She decreed further that I was the type who MIGHT report the Church’s crimes to the authorities, and on this "might" she barred me from receiving further services. The Church was to retain the large sums of capit al which I had paid in.

This was an act of blackmail under the disguise of an act of justice. What distinguishes her denial of justice as blackmail rather than justice is that the Church of Scientology is not a political entity, handing down punishments for infractions of civil laws--it is a church, accepting large sums of capital paid in for spiritual relief and enlightenment. Threatening to use the Executive or Judicial capacities of a local jurisdiction to justify denying the spiritual services I had paid for, while ke eping the large sums of capital (which would have brought my financial obligations current) effectively labels Louise as "Trouble Source, Type C" (threatening to tattle to the authorities about other Scientologists), and comprises the self-righteousness mechanism (Service Facsimile--not practicing what they preach) of the Church Leaders. It should be noted that I was in progress, handling the financial obligations in court before the severe, "Hard-sell" actions from Church of Scientolog y, International Management, and the failure of "Post Duties" of Guillaume LeSevre, Executive Director-International, and the severe suppression by Dallas Staff, whose slander broke up my engagement, whose "co-mingling of funds", caused the loss of my wealth, the loss of my family’s home, and whose statements that I was "evil and psychotic" nearly resulted in the loss of my life.

12) Throughout 1993,94,95 when I came to the church, to buy books or otherwise utilize the large sums of capital I have paid in, personnel have been trained to call security who tell me I have to leave the church, and closely "shadow" me until I leave, telling me I am not welcome at the church.

In August, 1993, I began a course in the courseroom I had paid for two years earlier. Louise Hamre, Master-At-Arms, Advanced Org, L. A., told me I was not allowed on course. There are four courses I have paid for, totaling about $3000.00, which the Church of Scientology refuses to allow me to begin or finish.

In July or August of 1993, my two bicycles, valued at about $2000.00, were stolen from the Scientology parking garage for which I was given a card key. The cables were snipped with a bolt cutter (left at scene). Church Security Chief, Michael Murphy, said LAPD had taken a report, but I never heard more about it. No one can get into the garage but Scientologists, who must pass by closed circuit TV monitors (recorded), and who must use a magnetic card key to enter.

In October or November of 1993, while I lived in a Scientology rooming house, my Scientology leather jacket and Scientology gold ring were stolen while I was out. The lock to my room was not damaged. I locked it before I left. Untouched were a gold watch I left beside the ring, and $37,000.00 worth of Stereo and Musical instruments. The House manager, Joanne Wheaton, from Canada, was an espionage operative for OSA (Office of Special Affairs), of the Church of Scientology. She told me that some o f her clandestine operations included "stealing government documents" from the federal government.

In December of 1993, when I tried to see the Chaplain at the Advanced Org of LA, Louise Hamre impeded and prevented me from getting his services. Chaplain services are a very basic part of promised assistance from the Church of Scientology for parishioners who are having trouble and need assistance. Her impedance added to the swindle and fraud by the Church of Scientology.

Although I believed the Church would keep its promises to deliver services to me at the time I paid for them, I was not informed that they have policy permitting them to renig and to deny at their whim, expensive services they have sold and promised.

On June 13, 1994, I was taking a walk in the "Wash", where the snow melts down from the San Gabriel Mountains. I was looking across this expansive river-like plain. I slipped into a sort of reverie. After some time, I noticed nothing was happening—inside. No thoughts, no thinking, no awareness—except that I really wasn’t aware of anything except the wash. As I tried to regain my thoughts I became aware that I was unable to think—period. This is difficult to explain. At first I though t I had simply reached a deep state of consciousness. I felt a sense that it was time to go, but it didn’t register that I had a home somewhere, or of its location, or that I was someone who had an identity, or a home. I knew it was "that way", and that if I walked there my house would be where I was going. Just out of caution, I tried to orient myself—to say my name, where I was from. My name didn’t come to me. The more I tried to remember who I was, the more evasive this information seemed to get. I tried to remember other things—what I had done that morning, or even how I got to where I was. I had thoughts of how concerned I could get about this, but surprisingly I felt no fear. I felt that if I had to, I could have remembered my identity, but I felt no pressure to remember. When I got home, Gail was there and I began to explain what was happening. Although I remembered her, and knew I was "home", I could not come up with her name. I explained all this to her, and felt handle d just by talking about it. I couldn’t bring myself to really try to remember my name. I kept assuring myself that this would go away. I couldn’t contemplate or remember or review anything—I could only survey what was in front of me.

It was three days before I could use my mind as a reasoning tool to any degree. In about a day, driving seemed to be automatic, and I seemed to "know" the way. I joked with my house-mates about it and they wondered about it a little. I was fully aware of the ability loss, but strangely, I could not get worried about it. At home I saw my name on papers, and I saw my Auto Title, and seemed to feel an effortless cognition of myself and my past—if I didn’t try to think about it. Everything in my environment was familiar, but if I tried to remember things, they wouldn’t come. I functioned better and better over the next week, but my lack of memory and my attention deficit were still substantial. I never seemed to be unable to function, but my short term, or scratch-pad memory, and my attention span are still compromised.

A few days after this happened I talked to Debbie, the Org Exec Sec at L A Org who asked if Gail might have caused this. I didn’t understand. She said that OT V’s were capable of doing things like that to people. I couldn’t comprehend that Gail would have caused this, but I was concerned that some Scientologist may have been interfering negatively in my life. I would never consider this but for the knowledge that Scientologists have committed rape, murder, vandalism, swindle, and that the y believe that it is alright for them to do these crimes. I feel immune generally, to the idea of "spells", and the evil intentions of others. This might be some unrelated phenomenon, but I needed, and still need, assistance with this difficulty.

On December 6, 1994, shortly after I turned in a comprehensive write-up to the Church of Scientology regarding injustices I had incurred at the hands of Scientologists, and the Church of Scientology, two windows were shot out of my van. On November 30, 1994, I pointed out to the International Justice Chief that Scientologists swarmed over me when I had money, then ignored me after the church had all my money. In that letter, I asked her "please send me some statement on what Scientologists con sider important". In retrospect, the two windows shot out of my van six days later seems like a pretty strong (albeit meaningless) "statement on what Scientologists consider important".

My landlady, Gail Rosencranz/Estrada, a high-ranking Scientologist, independently turned in a report to the church, commenting that my van windows were blown out with a gun shortly after I turned in my report. Her report was not made as a supporting report, and it was of her own volition.

I wanted to find help from someone to help me from what I considered a "Catch-22" paradox within the church. I still persisted that the Scientologists acted sanely and that I mustn’t get outside help because I would be branded PTS Type C, a "Judas". The implant that anyone who could act against the church is evil and insane, was very well entrenched. I was frozen in time by the Church attitude that they controlled and even threatened my eternity. I dared not report them. I w as not permitted participation—I was in fact "dead-filed"—a condition in which Scientologists will not relate to me, but will not inform me that they will not relate to me. When I learned of this I recognized it as one of the most harmful, destructive actions that could be taken against others.

During this time everything that happened in my daily life caused me anguish and introversion. The usual share of hostile persons one encounters in a big city seemed to be blaming me for thinking badly about the church. Rock songs on the radio seemed to be about me. A song, "Runaway Train", by a group called "Soul Asylum", seemed to suggest that I had gone so far astray that I could never get back:

Runaway Train

It seems no one can help me now,

I'm in too deep; there's no way out

This time I have really led myself astray

Runaway train, never going back

Wrong way on a one-way track

Seems like I should be getting somewhere

Somehow I'm neither here nor there

Can you help me remember how to smile?

Make it somehow all seem worthwhile

How on earth did I get so jaded?

Life's mystery seems so faded

I can go where no one else can go

I know what no one else knows

Here I am just a-drownin' in the rain

With a ticket for a runaway train

And everything seems cut and dried,

Day and night, earth and sky,

Somehow I just don't believe it

Runaway train, never going back

Wrong way on a one-way track

Seems like I should be getting somewhere

Somehow I'm neither here nor there

Bought a ticket for a runaway train

Like a madman laughing at the rain

A little out of touch, a little insane

It's just easier than dealing with the pain

My self-doubts were strong enough that this made me introvert on my questioning of my church.

Another title, "Losing My Religion", by the group, REM, quipped "That’s me in the corner. That’s me in the spotlight losing my religion." I felt I was being biographed.

A song entitled "Under the Bridge" by The Red Hot Chile Peppers seemed to render an account of an incident too painful to face. This song played incessantly as I wandered for two years in the streets and hills of Los Angeles abandoned by Scientologists.

Under the Bridge:

Sometimes I feel

Like I don't have a partner

Sometimes I feel

Like my only friend

Is the city I live in

The city of angels

Lonely as I am

Together we cry

I drive on her streets

'Cause she's my companion

I walk through her hills

'Cause she knows who I am

She sees my good deeds

And she kisses me windy

I never worry

Now that is a lie

I don't ever want to feel

Like I did that day

Take me to the place I love

Take me all the way

It's hard to believe

That there's nobody out there

It's hard to believe

That I'm all alone

At least I have her love

The city she loves me

Lonely as I am

Together we cry

I don't ever want to feel

Like I did that day

Take me to the place I love

Take me all that way

Under the bridge downtown

Is where I drew some blood

Under the bridge downtown

I could not get enough

Under the bridge downtown

Forgot about my love

Under the bridge downtown

I gave my life away

Even in the duress, I recognized this as pretty advanced neurotic, or even psychotic phenomenon.

Another song, Reason to believe by Rod Stewart, I quote in its entirety, to indicate the stress I was experiencing

If I listened long enough to you,

I'd find a way

To believe

That it's all true.

Knowing that you lied

Straight faced, while I cried,

Still I look to find

A Reason to believe.

Someone like you

Makes it hard to live

Without somebody else.

Someone like you

Makes it easy to give

And never think about myself.

If I gave you time to change my mind

I'd try to leave all the past behind.

Knowing that you lied

Straight faced, while I cried,

Still I look to find

A Reason to believe.

Someone like you makes it easy to live

Without somebody else.

Someone like you makes it hard to give

And never think about myself.

If I listened long enough to you,

I'd find a way

To believe

That it's all true.

Knowing that you lied

Straight faced, while I cried,

Still I look to find

A Reason to believe.

Still I look to find a reason to believe.

(by Rod Stewart)

It was this song that helped me to realize the fraud and criminality of the church.

While in L. A., I rented mostly from other Scientologists. One by one the church Ethics Officers slandered me to them, and I was asked to leave place after place. Finally I was left by myself in a strange culture of 17 million people, while I tried to present the injustices in a way that would impinge on the church leadership.

The traumas of this period could have been stopped by any of the several terminals or Ethics Officers I had visited. But in retrospect I have to realize that an Ethics Officer gets credits for persons blamed and brought to repent—but is in trouble for production if no one is bad. I believe that the Church of Scientology must be designed against itself, that is "contra-survival".

I have complied with the Church of Scientology’s requirement that I remain passive to their abuse, and embezzlement, and their breaking up my engagement, and costing my children their home.

My professional abilities have been seriously compromised. I install possibly the best music systems in the world in large homes. I recall before my problems with the Church of Scientology, I was very capable at selling customers on how I could help them and how my recommended improvements would improve their quality of life. Though in present efforts to ply my business, as I talk to my customers and prospects, I feel the consequences of three years of misery, introversion, self-doubts, and loss o f self-confidence, resulting from the Church of Scientology’s invalidation and suppression in my life. I was reduced to personal Non-existence (suicide) through the bungling, make-wrong, and suppression of Scientologists. When "father" becomes "charred body", do you suppose my children or any other witnesses could care for Scientology? What could a child’s perception of her father as a charred body do to promote Scientology? Try to calculate the damage to these children or to public f rom the mere consideration of suicide as a result of Scientologists’ suppression. Scientology charges that suicide attempts are merely an effort to manipulate or embarrass others. The devastation in my life was nullifying my desire to live. This final insult to one who was on the brink of eternity was not salvaging. If Scientologists can reason that I could give up the woman I loved more than life, in order to bring down a group that loomed as God to me, then their thinking is twisted and they are insid iously evil. I had no desire to hurt myself nor any church. My only thought was to stop the unbearable pain of the losses and disappointments delivered by the Church of Scientology. My children are living at subsistence level. I am ashamed at my stupidity at letting such a harmful group as the Church of Scientology exert such a devastating influence on my family.

My investigation, authorized by the Policy, "Ethics Gradients", has turned up a number of affidavits, sworn testimony, against Scientologists and the Church of Scientology including damaging testimony from an attorney, an ex-marine, and a U. S. Judge, as well as several rather high-ranking and accomplished Scientologists. These affidavits charge the Church of Scientology, and Scientologists, with crimes such as murder, rape as punishment, larcenous vandalism as punishment, orders (called E nd Of Cycle, or EOC orders) to parishioners to commit suicide, and stockpiling heavy arms in Hemet, CA, for the purpose of defense from the authorities. I understand that Suppressives are at war against us, spreading malicious rumors, but some of these affidavits are inter-corroborative, and are corroborated by other individuals. Inasmuch as you are swift to attack your enemies through the courts, your failure to challenge these affidavits is tantamount to tacit agreement with them. This generates much doubt toward the church among the fourth dynamic—specifically these uncontested affidavits are ARCX’ing the fourth dynamic. Your failure to address these affidavits is addressed in Ethics Technology as follows:

-Per Policy, It is a listed crime to "[Permit] a section, unit, department, org, zone or division to collapse.(Intro to Scientology Ethics, p201)

-Per Policy, It is a listed crime to "[Condone] circumstances or offenses capable of bringing a course, section, unit, department, org, zone or division to a state of collapse".(Intro to Scientology Ethics, p203)

-Per Policy, It is a listed Suppressive Act to "[to Fail] to strenuously act to clean up an ['Affinity-broken field', and is] deemed a high crime for an Executive Council."(Intro to Scientology Ethics, p222).

You are instructed to disprove these affidavits or apply the Conditions Formulas:

Vicki Aznaran’s First Affidavit

Vicki Aznaran’s Second Affidavit

Jonathan Caven-Atack Affidavit

Michael J. Flynn Affidavit

Steven Fishman Affidavit

Judge John M. Ideman Affidavit

David Mayo Affidavit

David Mayo’s Second Affidavit

Monica Pignotti’s Affidavit

Robert Vaughn Young’s First Affidavit

Robert Vaughn Young’s Second Affidavit

Stacy Young’s First Affidavit

Stacy Young’s Second Affidavit

Andre Tabayoyon Affidavit

Mary Tabayoyon Affidavit

These can be located by name searches on the Internet, possibly most easily found under the keyword, "Scientology".

There was a posting on the Internet of an excerpt of Ron’s Journal 38. I have bought a complete LRH Library and I don’t remember ever hearing this excerpt. It is very incriminating to the church leadership and the RTC. There should be an investigation to see whether this was cut from Ron’s Journal 38, or is a counterfeit!

> Ron's Journal 38

Ralph Hilton posted Ron's Journal 38, dated September 13th 1984, and

intended for distribution following his death. Some excerpts:

"It is true that I took some money from the Church but not all of it. The

RTC has altered my intentions.

"I have found out about the atrocities that have been going on in the name

of Scientology for the past few years. I am heavily grieved that this

could happen, but you will recall that I mentioned its possibility if the

wrong terminals ever got control of the tech.

"Well I am afraid this has happened. The actions of the current RTC,

Watchdog Committee, CMO, Contracted Legal Staff and others have been

nothing less than treacherous. They have not done what I requested after

leaving the Church of Scientology.

"I want you to know that I did take a large amount of money, approximately

one hundred million dollars and put it away for the future. It is for our

future. When I return I know that the research and work to continue

clearing this planet will be critical by the time my next body will be

able to handle the job. Money on this planet is a necessity, not a luxury.

This large sum of money will give us the needed financial strength to take

on the job of keeping Scientology working.

"You fellow Scientologists who have been ripped off in the last few years,

to you all I apologize. You wonderful, glorious, fantastic Sea Org members

who have been falsely RPF'd for being able to question or think on your

own, I apologize. To you Sea Org members who have gone months without pay,

months with poor rations, who have given so much these past few years

while your leaders were ripping you off, I apologize and I cry.

"And finally to my good friend of 22 years, David [Mayo], I apologize. You

were left with the responsibility to keep the tech until my return. You

have been punished and accused of crimes and high crimes for which I know

you are not guilty.

"Disconnect from the RTC. I never donated the tech to them. I only loaned

it to them. They have subverted my intentions for their personal profits.

David Miscavige has become a criminal and coward of the lowest order.

Leave him and his cohorts alone to their hell for eternity."

Message-ID: <31f02823.0@orac.idiscover.net>

If this were cut from the original by a church leader the needed action is obvious.

If this is a hostile counterfeit, it is ultimately a result of our ARCX’ing the fourth dynamic—emerging through the Internet. If the field had great affinity for us, there would never be such hostility. Regardless of the outcome of the investigation we must gain their trust and affinity. We have the Technology for doing this. It’s called "Liability Formula". More effective than the Pied Piper, the application of ethics tech should bring the fourth dynamic to our doors. The PROGRAM I h ave devised for you will accomplish this.

As the one who gave us something that we pay our fortunes for, Ron seems to be exalted. He is certainly very special. I certainly paid my fortune. Somehow Scientologists must look far enough to see that propitiative worship to the point that we abandon our own beingness is an aberration. We will remain aberrated—needing Clearing—so long as we ogle and surrender our self-determinism to any individual of our same species (fourth dynamic).

Ron is not the Universe. He is not the space around us. He is within that space and we must learn to spot him in that space. The strong influence he has had on each of us has blinded us to the reality of his existence. Like other aberrations, ogling and propitiation are caused by reactive mind bank phenomenon. This overwhelm is an aberration, and none of us can consider himself clear until he identifies and resolves this aberration.

I believe none of you considers that Ron had the GPM (compulsive ambition) that he was a "holy man". Indeed he described feeling "holy" as an aberration. If you have found yourself feeling an importance (a compulsion) about Ron that caused you to abandon Self, then possibly you have felt the pressure of someone else’s ser fac (self-correctness compulsion).

I believe none of you has missed that Ron can on occasion be involved in some mischief. ……………………

Up to this point I have been speaking in understatements and euphemisms for a purpose. As a Scientologist you will undoubtedly find the harsh reality I am about to present to you extremely offensive. To the degree it is difficult for you, you have caused the difficulty for yourselves.

For some years I dallied in Doubt and Confusion, refusing to believe I doubted—refusing to admit to confusion. Next, for a period of two years I carefully applied the ethics formulas, and spotted Ron in this Universe—and found myself in this Universe as well, without feeling a need to be less than I am. I also determined the relation between reactive mind, Ron’s Technology, the state of Clear, and spiritual advancement. But most of all I have defined Ron’s shortcomings (just like the ones we al l have). My willingness to confront his shortcomings while continuing to be impressed by his accomplishments has enabled me to forgive him, and to separate his outnesses from the gains one can make through his Technology.

Demonstrable compassion is the true test for a religion.

Compassion can remain unseen, especially in the presence of humility, so...

Demonstrable harmfulness can be used as a positive indicator of lack of compassion.

Megalomanic, totalitarian, arrogant, smug, and elitist are qualities of the harmful person or group.

Buddha used the term "ahimsa" (Random House Unabridged, non + injury) to indicate the most notable characteristic of the religious participant.

Evolution of the Religious Pursuit:

1) We are spirits living mortally.

2) Mortality is an illusionary trap.

3) Prudence is desiring that "I" escape the trap.

4) Sociability is inclusion of others with "I".

5) Compassion is going back for others.

6) Religion is guiding them out along the rope you tied to the doorknob.

Therefore the practice of religion is a function of compassion. Harmfulness betrays a lack of compassion, and therefore, a counterfeit religion.

The "mortal agreement" has always been, "Let’s try all the doors, and the first one out come back for the rest of us".

Ron Hubbard didn’t build a door, he found one. And although he may have woven the rope, He was, as a causative co-constructor of the original mortal trap, in agreement to come back for the rest of us. To say that he wasn’t is to say that he is uncompassionate. Human mortality did not suck Ron in, and we did not trap him. He co-constructed our mess with us. Although I’m in awe of his diligence, we do not owe Ron a heart-beat for the rope. Ron now has more than anyone could ever owe him. The rop e is woven from the fibers of fear, grief, confusion, and dispair, then discovery and enlightenment by many individuals. If Ron had acted alone, he would not have had the fibers for his rope. The compassion that brought him back with a rope, reflects the need he felt for us. Our escape and our company are his reward. Only arrogance could demand amends from us. The rope is his amends to us.

The basic requirement and most observable characteristic of religious sincerity is COMPASSION, also "the greatest good for the greatest number", which is the rule for democracy.

The basic requirement and most observable characteristic of religious insincerity is harmfulness, but also megalomania, arrogance, smugness, elitism, and "the greatest good for the smallest number", which is the rule for totalitarianism.

It’s difficult to run after people with "compassion thermometers". It’s a bit easier to observe harmfulness qualities--megalomanic, arrogant, smug, elitist--and harmfulness patterns--

totalitarian (Random House, #2, "exercising control over the freedom, will, or thought of others), threatening, and menacing others.

Persons without compassion and humility who are permitted to attain spiritual abilities cause harm to others. This is what is happening in the Church of Scientology.. A church acting without compassion and humility is acting fraudulently. They have alienated prolificly as they individuate from the society. Scientologists recognize individuation from the group as a phenomenon which occurs when one has wronged others

Application of religion by an individual, or a group, to others, is for the purpose of bringing others to spiritual cognizance. We all attain spiritual cognizance according to our own abilities. But no one individual promotes to spiritual domain alone (to do so, one would be devoid of the prerequisite--compassion). When all people attain spiritual cognizance, then we all promote to spiritual domain together. It is prudent (prudence, Random House, defn #3, "regard for one’s own interes ts") for an individual to seek promotion to spiritual domain. When the individual wants for all others what he wants for himself, he is said to have compassion. He desires "the greatest good for the greatest number"--the definition for GOOD. When he realizes that all must promote tegether, he has balanced between prudence and compassion. He works equally hard to attain promotion for himself and for others. This drive to assist others toward their spiritual cognizance is the " ;religious activity". When an individual works only for his own promotion, he lacks compassion. His motivation is, "the greatest good for the smallest number" (self)--the definition of EVIL. He will harm others for his own advancement--but will not attain it. Only when we all care for the advancement of all others, will we all promote--together. Imparting compassion is the most expeditious religious activity. Someone you see without compassion is someone who is holding us all bac k. A closed group who seeks for their own advancement to the exclusion of others is an evil group. When these groups are licensed by governments they can do much harm to others. Licensing agencies should monitor compassion among religious groups and group members. Since compassion is observable by subjective qualities, not by objective qualities, monitoring is best done by detecting those qualities opposite to compassion--Harmful qualities such as megolomania, arrogance, smugness, elitism, etc. Elitism is deception, and dishonesty. It is the idea that an importance, or fashion, or "fine stuff", has gained him a place in line ahead of others who have earned their position. It is applied better by actors than by the spiritually cognizant. Smugness is a facial illusion. Smugness is the application of horse manure to one’s face in order to gain preference or position. You can actually see it in the face of a smug person.

It is prudent and compassionate for groups to apply their major efforts to those who SEEK spiritual cognizance and promotion. It is elitist, smug, and arrogant for groups to give priority to wealthy or famous individuals, as opinion leaders, for the purpose of promoting themselves--individually or as a closed group. Inasmuch as Advertising/Public Relations is "professional lying" and leads to demographic selection, this leads to a caste system which is not conducive to planetary sp iritual promotion. As individuals "blossom" into compassion at all levels of society, they should be rewarded, and encouraged to contribute and participate. If they are denied recognition and participation, they lose prudence and eventually forget why compassion once seemed so important. This blossoming is more observable in a democracy where constituents are free to create special groups that cognite on a particular social ill--environment, animal rights, family protection, etc., than i n a totalitarian state where the individual is invalidated, and discouraged from stepping out of the "command channels".

When religious services are expensive, then prudent and highly-competitive sales personnel compete for the positon of "disseminating" the religious services. The stakes are high, and their focus can shift from compassion to prudence. Their motivations and the motivations of the group can darken from motivation for all others (compassion) to self-, or group-motivation (prudence). The shift from compassion to prudence can bring about a "smug, elitist, caste" group. This is not to deny group prudence so that group members, in "cloistered" environments, can develop spiritual cognizance and experience the spiritual domain, but it remains true that "overly prudent" will scorch them as their responsibility to others impinges. Motivation by any principle other than "the greatest good for the greatest number" (compassion) reduces them to "less than" a religious group. The test indications are blatant smugness and elitism, and whether others beco me harmed from the practices of the group. Inasmuch as Scientologists have harmed (not only) myself, by their criminal, swindling, and abusive techniques, they have and will harm others, and they are suspect for being something other than a religious group.

Ron Hubbard is abusive, and totalitarian. The Sea Organization, in their propitiation to him, are this, plus arrogant, smug, and elitist as they "wear" their idea of "a winning personality". They are a closed group devoid of compassion and humility--and others are being harmed.

Elitist and smug disqualifies a group as having compassion, but crime, swindling, and abusiveness indicate a highly harmful group which must be corrected or eliminated.

Whereas a religion should be defined by the aims of its members to provide a solution to the problems of mankind (indicating compassion), and whereas this compassion will manifest itself visibly as an attitude of service to mankind as opposed to an attitude of controlling mankind, please be advised that the Church of Scientology falls short of those properties that would define it as a religion. This understatement does not indicate how much more harmful this group can become if they continue to wor k under the premise that they "own" salvation and mankind "owes" them for it, and that their relationship to those whom they "serve" is one of "controllership", and demanding of political allegiance--controlling their constituents to the detriment of their personal, familial, and public obligations.

The licensing of religious groups should reflect observable compassion, and the absence of harmfulness among the personal traits of its members.

Source Policy would lead one to believe that there is only one reason for unresolved Doubt…that you have some unresolved past ethics situation. I have discerned at least one other reason…an unresolved present contradiction—an enforced reality. It involves PTSness and therefore is also an ethics situation (in present time). An arrogant person who has enforced a reality on you, or has Fleeced you, would have you look (with futility) in the past to locate your ethics problem t o account for your doubt. His purpose would be to cover-up his action of enforcing a reality on you. This is actually hypnosis (if successful). This is perhaps the most severe case of Socio-Path suppression there is. It is Implant Technique. Large groups can be made to introvert and back-track, searching for what they did wrong (rather than if they did something wrong). By Policy they are stuck there until they come up with something they will call wrong. It becomes less difficult to mock-up a "found" outness in one’s past as the reason for the present time doubt.

This first-dynamic stifling has become a third-dynamic seething, and accounts for the nattery staff one can find in the present-day church. A repressed Doubt acts the same as a candid Doubt. It is a "flow 0" overt, and it individuates one from the group—as well as from oneself. PTS staff, with their shared reality (an enforced reality), individuate as a group. As you observe those staff who are nattery and enforcing (as they take on the winning valence), you will identify those who are in f irst-dynamic betrayal—and who, by their actions, are validating an aberrated leadership.

From this time on, the "Repair of Past Ethics Conditions" ethics procedure (RPEC), with a rising TA, or which will not flatten, will include a prompt for an enforced reality in PT, and if necessary, for a suppressor, in PT. Individuals do find doubts—in any religion—and these must be handled correctly. The statement that one enters a new group in Non-E is not entirely correct. More often than not, one enters the group in doubt, and if not resolved, causes—and incurs—damage.

Enforced Reality, with covered-up blaming and "held-accountable" (in RPEC), then, is the chief source of the damage done to the third dynamic, The Church of Scientology. And this has followed a policy of "The End Justifies the Means", which is an extension of "Gray-Scale Ethics", which is a reflection of the "many-valued logic scale" (righter vs. wronger).

When you advertise that Scientology is compatible with Christianity you are giving false stats for individuals’ doubt formulas. During doubt application they come to wrong conclusions about Scientology. This knocks them down to Enemy condition when they pick up your contra-Christ elements in the Tech, or from other Scientologists. One is incapable of successfully applying Doubt Condition when they receive your false reports for their formula. Then when they approach OT III, or when your true view s regarding Christ come out through their studies of the Tech, or on the Internet, or any other channel, they naturally vacillate around Doubt, Enemy, and Liability. You then have a group of Christian-background parishioners who are "stuck in doubt". This is going to carry across even through OT III by which you are endangering them with your bypass of truth. You have bypassed full disclosure, and you have bypassed their minds—deciding directly for them what they will accept. Even if this < U>is based on truth about Christ from 75 million years ago, it is a harmful act toward 1/3 of the fourth dynamic as you cause them to be "stuck in doubt", and you endanger their safe transit of OT III. This is called deceit, covert hostility, and there is sufficient support of this covert hostility among all Scientologists to establish you as suppressive toward the fourth dynamic labeling yourselves actionable under Scientology justice procedures. Your agreed-on viewpoint of this is such as to obligate yourselves to accept the authority of one who steps in as a deputy in a crises. Your compliance with the ethics program outlined herein will correct the labeling and avoid SP declares for all Scientologists who comply. As you passed Enemy Condition on your way down to Confusion, you abandoned your post and consequently no longer have authority or jurisdiction—or even the entitlement to act as [your post name]. It is too late to reverse a forty year policy of representing that you a re compatible with Christianity. It might be too devasting to take a stand as "Anti-Christ", or even as "Contra-Christ". You have gotten yourselves into an extremely difficult situation. You should consider carefully how you will resolve this. I strongly suggest full disclosure, and that is the action I shall take. 2 billion Christians are too strongly committed to destroying the Anti-Christ to ignore this, or to take a position of "covert hostility", (deception, or 1.1 on the tone scale). Their viewpoint is too strongly entrenched in society, the governments, and in the militaries, of Western civilization for you to take this lightly. Only truth can correct past deceptions, and past Doubt, and leave you surviving. If you represent your beliefs candidly, you can at least have the protection of a society indulgent of opposing viewpoints. It would be best if you had never chosen a path of deception.

Speaking for myself, I fear for my eternity on deciding to stand with you. I have reality on your "regression" techniques of resolving past traumas, griefs, aberrations, and wrong understandings. I have hope for the idea of subsequent (after Clear) spiritual enlightenment. Until I undergo the OT levels (which are secret) I cannot possibly make a decision on them. Any one who does is dishonest both to himself and to society, and to the church. Thousands of you have done this, as you wil lingly declare your belief in everything presented to you. Hopefully this is the single item responsible for your nattering, witholdiness, and harmfulness (vandalism, grand larceny, rape, murder, and orders to commit suicide [End of Cycle Orders] ).

A choice to continue deception will result in warfare with many established religions. An effort to fairly persuade, or convince, will assure your survival. Giving the fourth dynamic the "Granting of Beingness" inherent in free choice, is easier than you think. There are many Christians who consider their religion unconvincing. Many of them go through doubts perennially. The only requirement is to demonstrate that you do not represent, for them, the "Anti-Christ"—that you are not a negative, "other-worldly", adversary. To date, you have demonstrated that you are a totalitarian dictatorship, opposed to Democracy and to Christianity, while using a line of "compatible with Christianity" to lure Christians. You have demonstrated that you, in order to impose your rule on the world, will stop at nothing. By deceiving, stealing government documents, murdering, raping, swindling, stockpiling heavy arms, ordering your parishioners to commit suicide (End of Cycle, or "EOC" orders), and other demonstrable charges, you have established yourselves as the worst we can imagine.

Even if you succeed in this route to "World Dominion", you will have merely substituted "Incident Three" for "Incident One", or for "Incident Two"—requiring as much future undoing for the trauma as you say is now required for Christ’s previous wrong-doing.

The Church of Scientology seems to have tread a path of total insanity and non-survival. In order to survive, you must reverse this. As you know, Ron’s "Ethics Conditions" are fully capable of turning this around, and even winning the world to your cause (via Liability Formula).

By reason of the items discussed under this topic, RPEC will be included in your Ethics program.

There is a policy on "Trouble-sources, healing, and Insanity", which serves the purpose of protecting the church from enemies who would attack us through their connections with unwilling or unwitting members who are prone to cooperate with them under duress. As it oppresses the rights of others, this is a much abused policy, although in one place it advises, "Consider the facts and act accordingly". This policy establishes the doctrine—alien to Scientology—that "Scientology cannot handle trouble".

This policy, in the estimation of Scientologists, threatens reprisals against others’ eternity. It specifically recommends:

Trouble Source Type A) Ostracism of those who do not abandon friends or relatives who are skeptical or opposing to Scientology

Trouble Source Type B) Blackmail of those who criticize the Church’s criminal actions.

Trouble Source Type C) Punishment for those who inform the authorities of the Church’s criminal actions—much like organized crime "hits" its informants, or adolescent gangs bully their "snitches". It is very much the childish threat, "If you tell on me, I’ll beat you up.

Trouble Source Type D) Ostracism of those for whom Scientology has failed—creating a hostile environment in which one is fearful of reporting failures of Scientology, thereby generating propitiative "Success stories".

The policy, "Trouble Source—Type C" (Threats of reprisals against those who report the church’s crimes to the authorities), flies in the face of other Policies: a) "Keeping Scientology Working" regarding being a "panty-waist"—taking no stand—when staff are taking actions which can alienate (ARCX) the public, or which can cause the collapse of Scientology, b) the doctrine of writing Knowledge Reports [to a body senior to the offending person] to expose the wrong actions of others, c) PTS/SP Technology regarding coming to cause over a suppressor, d) The Scientology doctrine of Responsibility, and Scientology Ethics, regarding allowing the suppression of others, e) "Ethics Gradients" which warrants an investigation, and by which such a suppressor can be brought to justice, f) The "Personal Integrity Course, which promotes maintaining one’s integrity, g) Scientology sales technique which instructs one to quote frequently, "Scientology can handle th at [problem]", and h) The Scientology "Code of Honor".

Application of this "Trouble Source—Type C" policy and its threats against one’s eternity constitutes various crimes, high crimes, and suppressive acts regarding, "permitting", or "condoning" the collapse of the Church, or of Scientology. This policy attempts to imbue the church with qualities so holy that their crimes shouldn’t be reported to the authorities. Current usage of this policy is applied under the viewpoint that the church permits the government, instead of the real world viewpoint that the government permits the church. Current application of, and compliance with this policy violates a members citizenship rights including first amendment rights under the constitution. The fact that Policy or church staff would willingly deprive us of our third dynamic rights under the constitution, presents the church as a suppressive group—witness how strongly they enforce this deviant reality on the membership. This policy makes the Scientology "Code of Honor" mean ingless.

The use of this policy which has damaged the church’s reputation, and has oppressed countless individuals could be prefaced with a simple test. "Is this punishment directed toward an enemy, or toward one loyal to the principles of Scientology?" By "saving" ourselves from each other—seeing ourselves as enemies, we have generated fear and hatred within and outside the church.

There is a line from the Scientology "Hardsell" course which reads, "The only [wrong] you can commit is to not [sell] the person in front of you". After reading affidavits alleging murder, rape, fraud, larcenous vandalism, suicide, and orders to commit suicide, all by Scientologists, I feel the need to review the distinctions between right and wrong.

In summary, this Policy on "Trouble Sources, Healing, and Insanity", is a declaration of irresponsibility for all trouble associated with the church, or with helping others.

The Rule against Verbal Data reduces one to a squelched state, and one of robotism. It dismisses any doubt you may have ever had, and dictates that even if you don’t totally believe all the matters in Scientolgy, you must behave as if you do. This is a key component of the enforced reality which Scientologists face. I have never known the statement, "If it’s not real for you, it’s not real", to stand up against the rule prohibiting Verbal Data. There are consequences provided for violators. "If it’s not real for you…" validates one’s first dynamic. The rule against Verbal Data quashes first dynamics.

It is sufficient to rule that the Technology will be used only as printed. It is acknowledged that verbal data can lead to mistaken assumptions. All Tech courses will include instructions to that effect, and possibly drills regarding refusing verbal data and requesting references to original documents as a test of a speakers knowledgability.

Intimidating or punishing is low-toned and will not be practiced. Teach individuals as well as possible and rely on that education for the seven years it takes to reach our goal.

>Advertise that Scientology is compatible with Christianity, then take anti-Christ stand.

>"Obey the law"…(Way to Happiness), hold parishioners responsible for misdemeanors (even reporting them to the authorities), when you commit felonies (arms caches, stealing documents from the government, raping parishioners, stealing and destroying parishioner’s automobiles, and taking an anti-democracy stand).

>We should, perhaps, discontinue claiming compatibility with Christianity. All religions differ. No other religion demurs nor feels wrongful in telling others that their religion is their religion—it is unlike others, except in that all religions deal with attaining salvation. Some religions seek some leader to dole this salvation to its members. Some religions believe you earn Salvation by hard work. Some religions believe you figure your way out. Some religions believe you process your viewpoi nt to that of seeing clearly. We have plenty to gain by candidly stating our techniques. We have much to lose by deceiving others into our camp, especially when we are critical of Christ, or Jesus, and, by this deception win Christians into our camp. This is very dangerous because Christians are super vigilant for a boogey man called the "Anti-Christ". When you take a critical stand against Christ, you are posing as the target that was prophesized for about one-third of the world ’s population. It so happens that most diligent seekers, from time to time, glance outside their belief systems to see what others have to offer. If we practice no hostility to their belief system then, we cannot become their targets, and we will not become alienated (ARCX’n) from them. If we acknowledge that, like them and all others, we are seeking personal salvation, then we will loom as an option to them at a time of doubt when they are seeking another route. If, on the other hand, we try to deceive them out of their differing viewpoints, with a deceptive (1.1 on the tone scale) sales technique—lying to the fourth dynamic about our actual intentions, then we will alienate (ARCX) the field, and will incur a wrath like that of the Crusades of medieval times. Do not underestimate the sincerity of Christians regarding their readiness to save Christianity and Christiandom from the "Anti-Christ"—their religion teaches them that the Anti-Christ will be totally destroyed. If you cons ider that you are powerful enough to withstand a mortal holy war from what you might deem an aberrated group, still do not make the mistake of posing as that target. I am talking about Western Civilization. You are physically less powerful than Sadaam Hussein’s armies. You, too, can lie in smoking desolation. Witness Waco. Witness Ruby Ridge. Witness the FBI. Just ask them how much they are going to enjoy taking your arms cache in Hemet, California. Ask any Christian how he will lose h imself for eternity if you win as the "Anti-Christ".

You have been very stupid in this. You do not understand the Christian mind. You do not understand that the greatest military might in history is staunchly influenced by this mindset, and loves to tackle oppressors, as you have presented yourselves. Unless, of course you actually are "Anti-Christ", and your battle-plan is to annihilate Christianity. If that’s the case, watch how fast your prospective markets "duck" to avoid being between the Stealth and the Fool. If you will just be honest, you have nothing to worry in Christianity other than the acrid dogma of the fundamentalists. Jesus demonstrated himself to be a social personality, offering help, as well as acknowledging the universal need for help, and propounding the sovereignty of the virtuous person. You would do well to evaluate your jeering and taunting of virtues such as compassion and meekness.

We should practice truth-in-advertising, and full disclosure when asking parishioners to invest heavily.

You should disclose your contra-Christ stand before you accept sums of capital from persons expecting Scientology is compatible with their former belief system, Christianity. To fail in this is economic dishonesty—fraud. And it is 1.1 on the tone scale.

You should disclose your totalitarian military command channel organization, and your intention of bringing all persons—all nations on Earth—into the Church.

You should disclose the claimed extra-planetary origin of the Galactic Federation of which the Sea Org is a member…

If your goal is truly to save all mankind from aberration by relieving trauma, grief, and implants, you will distance yourself from that Source Policy and that segment of Church Leadership which dramatize an insatiable desire for control of your constituency—the plan being that all Earthlings will ultimately be a part of that constituency.

Catch Phrases

These phrases inhibit others from being right, or they avoid responsibility or trouble for the church, or they threaten reprisals to others. You won’t observe the use of these critical phrases among compassionate persons--only among Staff and field leaders and those with unresolved/unconfessed sins. Much of the practice of Scientology is the art of transferring your wrongness to others, so that your statistics (accomplishments) appear greater than they are. In his efforts to make a universal i ndex to the human mind, Ron over-simplified many things into neat, packagable cliches. I have included many of them in this list.

"You’re Ser Facking" (You’re being hypocritical.)...so one feels guilt instead of expressing rightness. Often used by persons who have no comprehension of its meaning, but who find it as a way of making themselves right. Persons who used to use foul or loud language to intimidate, find that this phrase is a powerful substitute for foul language to make themselves heard, or right.

You’re being a victim...to prevent one from assigning aggression, or harmfulness to Scientologists--as doing so makes him appear to be a victim. Ron has successfully implanted shame and regret about admitting another has damaged you. This implant saves the church from the profuse law suits it would otherwise face. Ron’s ‘wrong definition’ is so strongly husbanded by Scientologists that they have totally forgotten the original meaning in their mother tongue.

"non-compliance=doubt"--shaming and blaming--"If you disobey, we assign you doubt condition". Very effective "or else" phrase, as the next condition down from doubt is "enemy".

"The only wrong you can commit is not to close (sell) the person in front of you." (quote from the "Hardsell Course", by L. Ron Hubbard.) This is blanket authorization to commit any act of coercion or domination toward another in order to close a sale. This is Scientologists’ "License to Kill" phrase. This justifies all wrongs done to others. This is encouragement to "reg’es" (registrars—Scientology salesmen), and Ron’s instructions to others to app ly boiler-room tactics "under the guise of doing good" for them. It is treachery and deceit. It is a fund-raising ploy. It is a statistics push. It is 1.1 (covert hostility) on the emotional tone scale.

"Other Fish to Fry"--Ron’s action of invalidating an individual’s right to "have a life". Ron ridicules individuals’ private goals by sneering at, and disallowing them to have "other fish to fry". This was an implant to prevent Scientologists from "having a life". Ron jealously wanted all staff to benefit only him--no one else, not even themselves. This is one of the most significant examples of his hypocrisy, greed, and megolomanic insanities. This is hyp ocritical in light of his statement, "It is the [reactive mind] bank that says the group is all and the individual nothing" (from Keeping Scientology Working--THE senior Scientology policy). Ron profusely displayed these "hypocrisy neuroses" (ser facs).

"helping otherth geth one tho muth cathe gain"---a "theety-weety" prosurvival, or manic implant to prevent staff from having "other fish to fry". No one in Scientology doesn’t want auditing. Especially staff want auditing (as it was promised as part of the exchange for staff work). Auditing is the method for getting case gain, but it is time consuming. When you need more work from staff, tell them the tooth fairy brings case gain, so their attention can go bac k to getting more work out. It has been known for millenia that service gains credit, and gives one an opportunity to work through his aberrations, but as Ron says, [people just haven’t been attaining significant case gain, or immortality, until I developed the Counseling Tech].

"Don’t be reasonable", or... "reasonable is a bad quality"--->"You’re being reasonable"...Once Ron got sarcastic about "being reasonable" as taking the comfortable way out, and forever after Scientologists have exiled the word from the language--and have become very unreasonable individuals. From "THE STUDENT HAT" COURSE, review the phenomenon of "WRONG DEFINITION". Ron was instructing you to avoid compromising Scientology to reactive mind--not to lose your sense of "reason", a virtue as defined in the English language. This is one of many examples in which, doggedly adhering to what you assert is Ron’s meaning, has compromised your sanity. The catch phrase goes, "Don’t get reasonable". Now read chapter 3, "On the Death of Consciousness", from Self Analysis, by L. Ron Hubbard: "The primary target of the enemies of man...is his right and ability to reason." Each time you scold another for " ;being reasonable", you are like an "enemy of man", targeting his "right and ability to reason". Contrast this with your alleged goals and purposes. This viewpoint against being reasonable is like having a "held-down-five" on that little calculator inside your head. With your badly programmed minds (implants) you are misleading and actually harming persons who come to you for advancement. This is an example of how Scientologists, via blind extension of Ron’s casual com ments, can give others implants, preventing them from reasoning through harmful catch-phrases. Can you think back to when (and from whom) you received this implant about "reasonable"?

"What is said to the Commodore’s Messenger is being said to the Commodore". ("Commodore" means Ron). No differences allowed, enforced compliance, totalitarianism, one-way comm, domination technique, insulting invalidation of the individual’s response. Hypnotic control implant requiring that parishioners give mindless, unquestioning adherence to the instructions given by the children sent out to relay non-negotiable orders from LRH (actually from the church leadership). Domi neering presumption that Ron’s slightest wish was our eternal command. A product of the brainless, hypnotic over-validation given Ron by his groupies during trance-like worship manics excited by mob psychology.

Imagine the frame of mind that comes over you when, as you realize the incredible effectiveness of the Scientology Technology, you feel "moved" to express profound appreciation for the gains you have received, then this innocent young thing appears before you, saying emotionlessly, something like, "Lick my nostrils". Immediately you are impinged by your prior resolve to never do anything that would offend the memory of this man who accomplished the impossible task of figuring the way out of the mortal dilemma. You smile and stoop as your tongue seeks the level of her nostrils. You would indulge the most demanding test to demonstrate your gratitude—this is nothing—can’t they give you a more challenging test of your loyalty?

What’s wrong with this picture?? This is the reactive mind bank that Scientologists are clinging to—a masochistic, propitiative worship implant. The same aberration that has caused every other religion to lose its meaning. This mindset is the mental equivalent of the smell of feces. Ron was the one who produced it—with the help of mindless Scientology groupies.

LOOK AT YOUR INSANITY!!! I do not permit you to continue this insanity in the name of religion. What would YOU do if you discovered such a Technology? It would be your spiritual duty to distribute it with all your beingness. To do less would label you as a cheating deadbeat. You would be cosmically indebted to every other individual to spread this. I accept Ron’s great work as amends for every wrong he has ever committed. Thank you Ron. Now I’m through with that! Clear the word, " ;fixation", in any dictionary. This is dumbshit, demonstrating the insanity of Scientologists. Let me spell out the ultimate outworking of this insanity. Your copyrights run out in a few years. After that, if you continue your totalitarian domination of humanity, You, your church, and your founder, enter oblivion, as