The 'Safe Asks Papers' -- OMITTED Ethics Policy Letter
OMITTED Ethics Policy Letter
---

It's Safe to Ask

Copyright © Safe -- www.fza.org <Safe@scientology.at>
From: theta88008@my-deja.com
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 11:17:48 -0800
Subject: OMITTED Ethics Policy Letter

Dear Scientologists,

This extremely important ETHICS POLICY LETTER by RON on 24 February 1969 called ...

"AN ETHICS POLICY LETTER -- JUSTICE" is Omitted from our Ethics book.

If this data ALONE were known to our broad Scientology public and staff, it would straighten out nearly all situations and people would never again get unjustly shot down.

I just can't imagine how such an VITAL policy letter on ETHICS is missing from the "new and improved" ethics book

My ownly explanatation is if somebody doesn't want this data well know. Only an SP wouldn't want this known.

1) WHO doesn't want you to have this data?

Somebody missed a BIG one by NOT including this protective Ethics Policy Letter in our ethics book.

Here is a quote from Ron in this ETHICS POLICY LETTER ...

"In an extension of 3rd Party technology (see HCOB of THIRD PARTY LAW) I have found that false reports and suppression are very important in 3rd Party Technology."

"We know as in the above HCOB that a Third Party is necessary to any quarrel."

"In reviewing several org upsets I have found that the 3rd Party can go completely overlooked even in intensive investigation.

A 3rd Party adds up to suppression by giving false reports on others.

In several cases an org has lost several guiltless staff members. They were dismissed or disciplined in an effort to solve enturbulation. Yet the turbulence continued and the area became even more upset by reason of the dismissals.

Running this back further one finds that the real 3rd Party, eventually unearthed got people shot by FALSE REPORTS."

This is a 3rd Party action which results in a lot of people getting blamed and disciplined. And the real 3rd Party remaining undetected."

(This is what happened during the mission takeover and Sea Org purge of 100's of staff and 100's sent to RPF in the early 80's. The third party remains hidden.)

"The missing point of justice here is that the disciplined persons were not faced with their accusers and were not given the real accusation and so could not confront it."

(Ron describes in bold exactly what has happened to me. The Scientogist who made the TOS complaint on AOL never faced me. They also violated our own Scientology policy by not sending me a CC of their KR (knowledge report) to AOL. which USE to be standard procedure. This Scientologist 3rd Party remained totally hidden. Also others who have spread rumors about me have never given me a SPECIFIC accusation (anything can be labeled "disruption" if you don't like it) so I was not able to confront it many times. Rampant 3rd Partying on me when rampant.)

"Another case would be a 3rd Party simply spreading tales and making accusations out of malice or some even more vicious motive. This would be a usual 3rd Party actin. It is ordinarily based on False Reports.

Another situation comes about when an executive who can't get an area straight starts to investigate, gets 3rd Party False Reports about it, disciplines people accordingly and totally misses the real 3rd Party. This enturbulates the area even more.

The basis of all really troublesome 3rd Party activities is then FALSE REPORTS.

There can also be FALSE PERCEPTION. One sees things that don't exist and reports them as "fact." "

Read the last sentence LRH says again.

A few examples of this are:

Back to LRH ...

"Therefore we see that we can readily run back an investigation by following a chain of false reports."

"After a lot of experience with Ethics and justice I would say that the real source of upset in an area would be FALSE REPORTS accepted and acted upon without confronting the accused with all charges and his or her accusers.

An executive should not accept any accusation and act upon it. To do so undermines the sucurtiy of one and all."

"Therefor we get a policy: Any false report leading to the unjust discipline of another is an act of TREASON by the person making the false report and the condition should be assigned and its penalties fully applied.

A condition of DOUBT should be assigned any person who accepts and disciplines another unjustly on the basis of a report which subsequently turns out to have been false.

This then is the primary breakdown of any justice system -- that it acts on false reports, disciplines before substantiation and fails to confront an accused with the report and his accuser before any discipline is assigned, or which does not weigh the value of a person in general against the alleged crime even when proven."

I suggest all scientoloigsts read this vital policy and, of course, word clear it. Then see if you can spot where the injustice is coming from and who is out-ethics.

Yours for real ethics and real justice,
Safe

(Recipient of the Scientologist "Kha Khan" Award and ARS "SP 5" status.) :-)

"Without an alternative to Scientology*, the people in it and the tools and technology of the mind they have are sufficiently powerful that it is feasible and possible it could end up controlling this planet."

(* Church of Scientology, Inc.)

-- Jack Horner (author of Summary of Scientology)

"Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us."

-- Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas (Justice for 36 years)

"Freedom encompasses the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and provocative". "Freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having."

-- Lord Justice Sedley

Scientologists: Work towards Freedom of Speech, Ban the Church of Scientology Censorship Software now!

For the truth about who controls CofS, Inc., go to:

http://clever.net/webwerks/veritas/

---

The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank