The 'Safe Asks Papers' -- List of Some Important Out-Points
List of Some Important Out-Points
---

It's Safe to Ask

Copyright © Safe -- www.fza.org <Safe@scientology.at>
From: theta88008@my-deja.com
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 18:06:03 -0800
Subject: List of Some Important Out-Points

Hi fellow Scientologists,

"out-points are really a description of idiocy." (ESTO 11, 7203C06 SO 1) "aberration is just the basis of out-points." (ESTO 4, 7203C02 SO II) "simply an illogical departure from the ideal scene. By comparing the existing scene with the ideal scene one easily sees out-points." (HCO PL 19 Mar 72 II) "anything that detracts from potential survival in any situation, dangerous or routine, is an out-point."

Here's just a quick list of few of the out-points and types. Notice ommissions is #1 in the list.

OUT-POINTS

a: omitted

omitted VITAL church stats in "WiS"
omitted Auditors code in Ethics book
omitted Code of Scientologist in Ethics book
omitted Code of Honor in Ethics book
omitted Church Creed in Ehics book
omitted 9 chapters in New Slant on life
omitted definitions
omitted references to source
omitted words, sentences, and paragraghs from Policy Letters
omitted addendums
omitted policies
omitted copyright info on all tech volumes
RTC's failure to insure purity of Ron's words

b: altered

Altered scripture
Altered tapes
pushed stats that mislead raw public

c. dropped time

no dates when Ron wrote PL's in ethics book
no copyright date
references and time droped

d. falsehood

Careless and false statements by Public Relations
False stats
PR Lies

e. altered importance

Promoting and emphasis on BOTWO (based on the works of) instead of LRH Ethics book promotes emphasis on behavior with CHURCH , behavior towards ALL HUMAN BEINGS.
Church emphasis in selling audio tapes instead of cheaper transcribed tapes into books
Emphasis on hardback books instead of cheaper paperback version of all LRH works
Massive distribution of paperback BOTWO "What is Scientology" instead of paperback versions of real LRH to public

f. wrong target

Myself
critics
splinter groups
wrongfully declared SP's
stolen missions

g. wrong source

RTC being gradually assigned source
BOTWO books

h. contrary facts

Church leaders do this all the time.
PR leaders do this

i. added time
j. added inapplicable data
k. incorrectly included datum (HCO PL 30 Aug, 74 II)

There's some. Feel free to add to this list and repost.

If this doesn't ring a big alarm in any Scientologist, then we better see if we're conscience or breathing. I've thoroughly documented the above in my over 500 posts here.

Yours for understanding our out-points,
--
Safe

(Recipient of the Scientologist "Kha Khan" Award and ARS "SP 5" status.) :-)

"Without an alternative to Scientology*, the people in it and the tools and technology of the mind they have are sufficiently powerful that it is feasible and possible it could end up controlling this planet."

(* Church of Scientology, Inc.)

-- Jack Horner (author of Summary of Scientology)

"Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us."

-- Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas (Justice for 36 years)

"Freedom encompasses the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and provocative". "Freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having."

-- Lord Justice Sedley

Scientologists: Work towards Freedom of Speech, Ban the Church of Scientology Censorship Software now!

For the truth about who controls CofS, Inc., go to:

http://clever.net/webwerks/veritas/

---

The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank