The 'Safe Asks Papers' -- What's an real SP? (Suppressive Person)
What's an real SP? (Suppressive Person)
---

It's Safe to Ask

Copyright © Safe -- www.fza.org <Safe@scientology.at>
From: theta88008@my-deja.com
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 17:59:07 -0800
Subject: What's an real SP? (Suppressive Person)

Hi fellow scientologists and non-scientologists,

There has been lots of non-source talk about what a suppressive is. So I'd like to give you the complete definition here as defined in our Dianetics and Scientology Dictionary.

"SUPPRESSIVE PERSON:

There you go. There is SOURCE data and references.

What I find interesting is definition #2 where Ron says "particularly knifes with violence anything calculated to make human beings more powerful or intelligent."

I'm find I'm getting knived very violently with black PR especially by Public Relations of CofS, Inc.

I can only view that my useful data I take the trouble to give on this newsgroup as information that can ONLY make others MORE powerful and intelligent.

With it ... the one's who are able to listen will be wiser because they cannot be fooled anymore. It's drives SP's mad when you tell them you're nobody's fool. When you do this, here's what they likely do next. I'll quote Ron exactly ...

"A suppressive automatically and immediately will curve any betterment activitity into something evil and bad. (SH Spec 73, 6608C02)"

There's no doubt that a few here has been trying to turn my betterment activitity of simply education and recommending ideas into "something evil and bad" and must be stopped. I'm sure reasoning minds can see this.

I'll also point out definition # 5 ... , they are a "no confront case". Does it look to you that they have legitimaely answered ANY of the real questions I've asked point by point?

I'm not talking in generalities here. I'm always VERY specific giving details.

So WHO are the real suppressives?

Yours for knowing the truth,
--
Safe

(Recipient of the Scientologist "Kha Khan" Award and ARS "SP 5" status.) :-)

"Without an alternative to Scientology*, the people in it and the tools and technology of the mind they have are sufficiently powerful that it is feasible and possible it could end up controlling this planet."

(* Church of Scientology, Inc.)

-- Jack Horner (author of Summary of Scientology)

"Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us."

-- Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas (Justice for 36 years)

"Freedom encompasses the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and provocative". "Freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having."

-- Lord Justice Sedley

Scientologists: Work towards Freedom of Speech, Ban the Church of Scientology Censorship Software now!

For the truth about who controls CofS, Inc., go to:

http://clever.net/webwerks/veritas/

---

The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank