The 'Safe Asks Papers' -- 'Hidden' CofS, Inc. Squirrels Busy!
Hidden' CofS, Inc. Squirrels Busy!
---

It's Safe to Ask

Copyright © Safe -- www.fza.org <Safe@scientology.at>
From: theta88008@my-deja.com
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 11:04:07 -0800
Subject: "Hidden" CofS, Inc. Squirrels Busy!

Hi Fellow Scientologists,

Squirreling within our church is apparently running rampant. The favorite type of squirreling seems to be OMITTED and MISSING data. Let me give a summary of what I've found so far;

If you can think of any more omitted data, alter-ises, please post it or email me.

It seems that "covert" and "hidden" is the watchword. What tone level is this indicative of whoever the SP's are within our ranks? How long are we going to stand around and let LRH works get lost, altered, and importance's get shifted with "wrong emphasis's?"

WHO is the source and ultimately responsible for allowing/making the above happen?

New Scientologists (especially) can't spot what's happening because they never knew what WAS before. Apparently many older Scientologists haven't bothered to compare. But there are many informed Scientologists that ARE aware but have lost hope because they think our church is in major SP's hands.

So how long can this alter-ising gradually happen without the subject eventually getting destroyed? If you don't think there isn't a serious attempt to destroy AUTHENTIC Scientology, you better look again harder.

All is NOT well and PUBLIC Scientologists need to be honestly told what is really going on. We just cannot allow MISSING data anymore. BOTWO books are starting to run rampant with no indication of who the writers are. Are we just going to keep getting more numb and accepting to "new", "improved" editions of LRH's original books? How can this be acceptable? WHO is promoting this idea?

You remember Ron talked about "lost technology" in depth in the study tapes? Well you're witnessing it LIVE and living it now.

This major squirreling is NOT going to stop unless all are made aware and very watchful from here on out. It's up to US, ultimately the PUBLIC Scientologists, to make sure things run straight within our own church.

I've pointed this data out as clearly as I know. Now, what are you going to do about it? Keep it hidden from other Scientologists? Or let them know we have a problem so maybe something can be done about it?

If just one person writes a report on this, it's going to get "deep-sixed" because it gets drowned in that same PTS/SP environment that CAUSED the problem. I've tried and NOBODY listened.

But perhaps if 1,000's of all Scientologists write KR's on this, it may get handled in a serious way. We just can't ignore this.

Will you take the "easy" way out and remain more comfortably blind to this? Or are you going to do something about it and keep Scientology working?

Yours for keeping authentic LRH works in existence, Safe

--
"Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us."

-- Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas (Justice for 36 years)

"Freedom encompasses the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and provocative". "Freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having."

-- Lord Justice Sedley

David Miscavige, Ban Church of Scientology Censorship Software now!

For the truth about who controls CofS, go to:

http://clever.net/webwerks/veritas/

---

The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank