Archive Message - 1995
---

Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be considered to be copywritten materials, I have censored myself and The Skeptic Tank by deleting any and all possible text files which describes the cult's hidden mythologies. I have elected to quote just a bit of the questionable text according to the "Fair Use" legal findings afforded to those who report. - Fredric L. Rice, The Skeptic Tank, 09/Sep/95 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- From news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!demon!sourplum.demon.co.uk!Dave Wed Jul 19 09:28:58 1995 Path: news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!demon!sourplum.demon.co.uk!Dave From: Dave <Dave@sourplum.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: The Big Story Date: Sat, 15 Jul 1995 21:41:15 GMT Organization: Home Lines: 23 Message-ID: <678265160wnr@sourplum.demon.co.uk> References: <3u5d4i$2he3@unixfe.rl.ac.uk> <modemacDBpyu1.MF3@netcom.com> Reply-To: Dave@sourplum.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: sourplum.demon.co.uk X-Broken-Date: Saturday, Jul 15, 1995 21.41.15 X-Newsreader: Newswin Alpha 0.7 In article: <modemacDBpyu1.MF3@netcom.com> modemac@netcom.com (Modemac) writes: > > Huw Morris (hm@custard.bnsc.rl.ac.uk) wrote: > It was interesting to note that Atack actually reads this group, > : which was something I didn't realise. > > This is an interesting statement, and it beggars an important question? > Was the Internet mentioned on the show? Was alt.religion.scientology > mentioned? If it was, then you can bet this newsgroup has still MORE new > readers. Don't know if a.r.s was mentioned - I only caught the last 10 mins of the program. However it prompted me to come back and catch up with what's happening in a.r.s. By the way I thought that the program was more than fair... -- Dave

---

Return to The Skeptic Tank Alt.Religion.Scientology Archives Master List
Go to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank