Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be
considered to be copywritten materials, I have censored myself and The
Skeptic Tank by deleting any and all possible text files which describes
the cult's hidden mythologies.  I have elected to quote just a bit of the
questionable text according to the "Fair Use" legal findings afforded to
those who report.  -  Fredric L. Rice, The Skeptic Tank, 09/Sep/95

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

From news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!demon!sourplum.demon.co.uk!Dave Wed Jul 19 09:28:58 1995
Path: news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!demon!sourplum.demon.co.uk!Dave
From: Dave <Dave@sourplum.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: The Big Story
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 1995 21:41:15 GMT
Organization: Home
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <678265160wnr@sourplum.demon.co.uk>
References: <3u5d4i$2he3@unixfe.rl.ac.uk> <modemacDBpyu1.MF3@netcom.com>
Reply-To: Dave@sourplum.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: sourplum.demon.co.uk
X-Broken-Date: Saturday, Jul 15, 1995 21.41.15
X-Newsreader: Newswin Alpha 0.7

In article: <modemacDBpyu1.MF3@netcom.com>  modemac@netcom.com (Modemac) 
writes:
> 
> Huw Morris (hm@custard.bnsc.rl.ac.uk) wrote:
> It was interesting to note that Atack actually reads this group,
> : which was something I didn't realise.
> 
> This is an interesting statement, and it beggars an important question? 
> Was the Internet mentioned on the show?  Was alt.religion.scientology 
> mentioned?  If it was, then you can bet this newsgroup has still MORE new 
> readers.

Don't know if a.r.s was mentioned - I only caught the last 10 mins of the 
program. However it prompted me to come back and catch up with what's 
happening in a.r.s. By the way I thought that the program was more than 
fair...

-- 
Dave