Archive Message - 1995
---

Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be considered to be copywritten materials, I have censored myself and The Skeptic Tank by deleting any and all possible text files which describes the cult's hidden mythologies. I have elected to quote just a bit of the questionable text according to the "Fair Use" legal findings afforded to those who report. - Fredric L. Rice, The Skeptic Tank, 09/Sep/95 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- From news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.onramp.net!dal20.onramp.net!user Wed Jul 19 09:30:02 1995 Path: news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.onramp.net!dal20.onramp.net!user From: visnet@onramp.net (Sri Changiana Saar) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: IMPORTANT! (Re: Forged cancels through US Dept of Energy computer?) Date: 19 Jul 1995 02:28:06 GMT Organization: United Rulers of Mankind, Local 112 Lines: 47 Message-ID: <visnet-1807952130490001@dal20.onramp.net> References: <003320Z19071995@anon.penet.fi> NNTP-Posting-Host: dal20.onramp.net X-Newsreader: Value-Added NewsWatcher 2.0b24.0+ In article <003320Z19071995@anon.penet.fi>, an128505@anon.penet.fi wrote: > In article <noringDBK4v1.G4t@netcom.com> Jon Noring wrote: > > : And I guess I'll just have to e-mail my computer security friends at LLNL (I > : have several), who work closely with DOE (particularly since winken at LLNL > : appears in the path of the forged cancellation message). DOE is *very* > : sensitive about misuse of their computers, *very* sensitive --> *VERY* > : sensitive^^2. I hope I made this clear how sensitive DOE is about misuse of > : their computing resources, especially to propagate the Federal crime of > : electronic wire fraud, not to mention the stifling of the Freedom of Speech > : guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. DOE does not want bad publicity either > : -- they've been rocked recently by the bad publicity of misuse of their > : computers, notably the person at LLNL who stored large numbers of > : pornographic images on an LLNL computer. > > > Christ, Noring, stop spouting about how DOE cares about their computer. > How many times do you have to tell us how well connected you are? A little > pedantic aren't we, with our 1st grade lesson on the Constitution? > > And who are you to go around *urging* groups to do certain things? I > urge you to climb under your rock. Buddah, Noring, keep up the good work! Here, stand on my shoulders if you need help up. Also, thanks for the lesson on the Constitution. *I* didn't necessarily need it, but jeez you'd think the clams had never heard of the silly thing. Never give up, Jon! -Changii -- Sri Changiana Saar, Merchant of Chaos, SP3! Crown Supplier to the Knights of Xenu "I think, therefore I'm overqualified to be a $cientologist." "I am afraid their [Scientology's] claim of teaching 1.5 million children in South Africa to read is just another fabrication." - Johan Klopper, Second Secretary, South African Embassy. "The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors." 17 USC 107

---

Return to The Skeptic Tank Alt.Religion.Scientology Archives Master List
Go to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank