Archeology finds more and more that the Bible is not true

Daniel Wilks:
Yes. Archeology and recent findindings/digs at the locations described in the Bible, Old Testement more than New Testement. They can be reserched through your public library's religion dept.

David Rice:
Archaeologists are finding more and more instances where the Bible is grossly wrong in its history.

• The Exodus never happened;

• Jericho fell in 2300BCE which means Joshua didn't destroy it;

• Ai was destroyed in 3000CE which means Joshua didn't conquer it;

• Daniel was written 500 years after the events it "predicts," and gets most of its history wrong;

• Mesha was victorious against the Moabites, but 2 Kings says the opposite;

• The Bible claims there was a King David but there is no evidence of such a king, even though history records most of the kings that preceeded and followed David's aledged rulership (such as the kings Omri, Ahab, Jehu, and Zedakiah);

• King Solomon seems to have never existed as well.