Wash DC Paranormal Critic Activity
Wash DC Paranormal Critic Activity
At least one person who was operating exterior to Scientology used
terrestrial communication to impart the message to passersby that human
bodies are infested with space aliens, and that this was what Scientology
charged people 300,000 dollars for. At least one other peron, also using
terrestrial means and operating exterior to Scientology mass, energy,
space and time, communicated that the foregoing message was actually a
secret.
Most of the passersby were observed using paranormal mental energy in a
decided effort to process one or the other of these messages. Some of them
expressed skepticism. These expressions were not always visible to the
naked eye, but could be sensed nonetheless. Earth flyers were handed out
to people in front of the Scientology building that included the following
public serivce message:
Scientologists are Wide Open to Blackmail
In late October 2001 this web page
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.com/extremists/cisarj1.html
published the following statement:
"Cisar was involved in selling illegal drugs just prior to
and during his tenure in the Navy".
After I asked the webmaster to remove the libelous statement and s/he
complied, I received a response from the webmaster of that page, which
included the following:
"We disagree that the statement is libelous based on the evidence
we have. Your memory appears to be faulty and contradictory with
prior statements you made on this subject."
I fully agree that the preceding libelous statement does not appear
"contradictory with prior statements" I made to my Scientology auditor.
But as far as I know, the only record that was kept of statements of this
sort was my auditing records. I have see n no evidence within a
reasonable amount of time that the libelous statement originated from
anywhere else than my auditing records of a quarter century ago.
Instead, the libelous statement was removed from the site. Scientology
has NO HOPE of proving in a timely manner that the origin of its libelous
statement was from any place other than my auditing records.
The only other way the webmaster could have known about my prior
statements would have been from former Scientologists. However,
practicing Scientologists do not make it a habit to talk about selling
drugs to each other. Now I'll proceed to the truthful ness of the
libelous statement.
1) I have never been charged, much less convicted, of any crime.
Verbally accused, yes, but nothing that anyone has ever deemed to be of
any consequence. 2) On more than one occasion, the FBI contacted all my
close friends that knew me before I went i nto and while I was in the
Navy. I had them listed on security forms. At the time my friends were
contacted, they all gave me good recommendations. That is what they told
me and I believe them.
Now Scientology has had plenty of time to substantiate its false
propaganda on me, but all its dirty tricks department can do is sit and
grin. :-) If they got their libel from an official criminal record or from
a newspaper, why haven't they webbed it? If it is from a living human
being, that person has not made a credible statement to back up the
previous false data within a reasonable time frame, even though failure to
do so lends credence to evidence that Scientology uses confidential
auditing record s for extortionary purposes.
Moreover, due to the fact that I gave Scientology auditors misleading
information which led to non-factual conclusions being published by
Scientology on its poison-pen web page, the first week Scientology's
poison-pen page on me was webbed, I was 99 perce nt certain that
Scientology culls information from auditing sessions for its poison-pen
reports. The next week 99.9 percent, the next week 99.99 percent and so
on. Now, this is so close as to be virtually 100 percent certain. I'm
positive Scientology has witnesses to me making statements from which it
could be concluded that I was involved in wrongdoing. They are or were
Scientology auditors. If Scientology would have actually had valid
substantiation on me to begin with - which they were not afra id to show
the public - they could have presented it without ever giving it a second
thought.
When I saw the false information Scientologists published, I REPEATEDLY
made a LOT of noise because I knew there was no documentation for it,
other than what was in my pre-Sea-Org auditing folders. Last I looked,
the web page still contained information I had given Scientology auditors
about my childhood, even though that particular information is not
particularly libelous, or for that matter, true. With me, Scientology is
faced with the problem of manufacturing evidence to prove its own libel.
But with others, Scientology's betrayal of trust will forever remain
secret.
Joe Cisar
http://www.innernet.net/joecisar/trip0000.htm
2 Dec 2001
Joe's Garage <swatron@hotmail.com>
(commonly known as a "picket report")
http://www.xenu.net/archive/thesis/cisar-home.html