Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology,alt.religion.scientology
In article <375944f9.17869501@news.demon.co.uk>, Steve A
While I don't believe in the Tech that's no barrier to my supporting
Safe as much as I support anyone else who has been ripped-off or abused
by current church management. Given the authoritarian nature of CoS,
I don't rate his chances of taking over, though I would like it if
he did. If he is a figure with a large following (like Mayo), he may
have a chance of founding a new organisation which this time could be
defended against CoS efforts to subvert it.
Subject: Scientologists Unite - Support Safe!
From: "Dave Bird --- ARS HakeMonger ,,,,><_'>.,,,<_\",,,," <dave@xemu.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 1999 16:01:36 +0100
<stevea@castlsys.demon.co.uk> writes
> This is our opportunity to rally behind Safe, and align ourselves with
> his aims and methods. After all, it seems to be a generally accepted
> view among critics that we are not necessarily all after stamping out
> Scientology as an end in itself: it is *reform* of Scientology, and
> the removal of the various fraudulent and dangerous practices that it
> follows. Sure, we may all believe that, practically speaking, this
> would mean the end of Official Scientology, but that is an incidental
> matter, as long as - one way or the other - they cease to lie, cheat
> and deceive.
|~/ |~/
~~|;'^';-._.-;'^';-._.-;'^';-._.-;'^';-._.-;||';-._.-;'^';||_.-;'^'0-|~~
P | Woof Woof, Glug Glug ||____________|| 0 | P
O | Who Drowned the Judge's Dog? | . . . . . . . '----. 0 | O
O | answers on *---|_______________ @__o0 | O
L |{a href="news:alt.religion.scientology"}{/a}_____________|/_______| L
and{a href="http://www.xemu.demon.co.uk/clam/lynx/q0.html"}{/a}XemuSP4(:)
Click here for some additional truth about the Scientology crime syndicate:
XENU.NET