I received hate literature through the mail this afternoon. It is more
than a little annoying that hate groups are allowed to send hate mail
unsolicited to anyone they want but then I recall that the ACLU once
helped the KKK retain the right to march.
My wife and sons read the hate cult's literature and I'm annoyed there
don't seem to be laws which can be applied to protect American citizens
from this kind of mail-out.
After going through the literature, I telephoned the hate cult.
I've described that conversation after the description of the
hate literature offered below.
This is a single sheet 12 by 17 inch glossy. It's folded so that
one ends up with three sections:
In 1996 President Clinton signed the bipartisan federal (sic)
Defense of Marriage Act, allowing states to define marriages
for themselves.
Today, 31 states have passed laws defining marriage as between
a man and a woman... but not California.
Several state courts are close to ruling in favor of "same-sex
marriages." And, since marriages performed in other states
are usually recognized as valid in California, a "YES" (sic)
vote is necessary to prevent California from having to recognize
"same-sex marriages" performed out of state.
Protect Marriage
Yes on 22
For more information, contact: Protestion of Marriage Committee.
1121 L Street, Suite 810. Sacramento, California 95814.
916.441.1010 phone. 916.441.1029 fax.
www.protectmarriage.net
The first section has 9 photographs, three of which are of Negro families
-- which is ironic to the extreme. I guess these hate mongers will be
magnaminous and allow "niggers" to marry in the State of California.
The fact that this hate literature and the hate initiative was created by
the Mormon cult makes them including blacks in their hate literature even
more ironic.
It's Simple...
"Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized
in California."
(entire text of proposition)
This section has a photograph of a white man and white woman getting
married. This proposition of hatred is no different than demanding
that "only marriage between whites is valid or recognized in
California." No difference!
And another bit of irony (which is maybe deliberate.) The White Supremist
hate mongers that worship Adolf Hitler also use the phrase "14
words" as well.
Questions and Answers about the Protection of Marriage
Initiative
What is the Protection of Marriage Initiative?
Protection of Marriage is a March 7, 2000 ballot proposition
that adds just 14 words to the California Family Code.
And no mention of the fact that these hate-filled homophobic bigots
aren't "protecting" anyone against anything.
"Only marriage between a man and a woman is valif or
recognized in California."
Why is this initiative necessary?
California law defined marriage as between a man and a woman.
Several state courts are close to ruling in favor of "same-sex
marriage." And since marriages performed in other states are
usually recotgnized as valid in California, we could be forced
to accept "same-sex marriages" performed out of state. A
"YES" vote is needed to close this loophole.
As if equal protection under the United States Constitution is a
"loophole."
California voters should be allowed the same decision. It's
out state; It should be our choice!
And while they're at it, why not pass laws that "niggers" can't get
married either? And how about people with green eyes? And left-
handed people shouldn't be allowed to get married, either.
Californians are fair-minded and respectful of other people's
beliefs and lifestyled. However, we understand the difference
between respecting a person's right to same-sex _relationships_
and endorsing "same-sex _marriages_."
See, these bigots will allow blacks to have sex with whites, but
they won't "endorse" blacks getting married to whites. Of course
they "respect" the black "lifestyle."
Keep blacks down and women from being allowed to vote or hold public
office since hatred and bigotry has been a cornerstone of society
for thousands of years. Any attempt to rectify a wrong must be
countered by the hate-mongering bigots at any cost.
Too bad these hate-mongering bigots' marriages are such shams that
allowing _everybody_ in America to have _equal_ protection under
the law some how negates these bigots' marriages.
Meanwhile gay couples will continue to pay higher taxes than
their straight colleagues, be granted equal medical coverage, have
the same rights to sign for medical care for their loved ones
in an emergency, and be protected by the law _equally_ under a
Constitution that allegedly guarentees them such!
And teach your children to hate just like these creeps.
What does a "No" vote mean?
California politicians have failed to clarify the law. Unless
we pass the Protection og Marriage Initiative, Californians
will likely be forced to legally recognize new definitions of
marriage created by other states.
A "YES" vote means that _California_citizens_ will preserve
our right to decide the definition of marriage.
Who is supporting the initiative?
The Protection of Marriage Initiative is backed by a coalition
of Californians from all walks of life; parents, teachers,
seniors, Democrats, Republicans, Independants, civic and
community organizations, church groups, and hundreds of thousands
of every day Californians.
Funny how they couldn't even answer their own rhetorical question,
huh? Fact is, this is a single hate group operating in California
and it's a _Christian_-_based_ hate group that is too embarrassed
by its own homophobic bigotry to admit publically who they are.
Specifically, it's the Mormon cult.
There are a lot of homophobics in the world.
(entire text of the proposition)
Vote Yes on 22
-=-
I telephoned the hate group to complain and I told the woman who
answered (she refused to identify herself) that I received hate mail
from you creeps and that I wanted to complain.
Her defense? She chucked about mailing out hate mail. I asked he
if she thought hatred and bigotry was something worth laughting about
but she didn't have an answer for that.
I told her not to send me her hate mail any more and she asked
what area I lived in. I told her and she assured me she wouldn't
send her hate mail to me again.
I informed her that she was a hate-mongering homophobic bigot
and all she could do is chuckle again and hang up. She seemed to
think it amusing that she could spread her hatred and bigotry
around California with impunity, exposing people's children to such
filth.
Cavalier and Associates
1121 L Street, Suite 810
Sacramento, CA 95814
Schroeder, Karl
(916)444-8080
NOC, Network Operations Center
800-711-5353
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
Section 1
Section 2
It's Common Sense...
It's Only 14 Words...
Section 3
A "YES" vote means that:
31 states and the United States government have already passed
laws protecting marriage.
Why should I note "YES?"
Vote "YES" to preserve the institution of marriage that has
served as a cornerstone of society for thousands of years.
Vote "YES." People will continue to have the right to live
as they choose, but not to re-define marriage for our entire
society.
Vote "YES" to send a clear and positive message to California's
children about the future of family strength.
Marriage: The way is should be, between a man and a woman.
Nearly 700,000 registered voters signed petitions to place the
Protection of Marriage Initiative on the March 2000 primary
ballot.
"Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized
in California."
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.