5.4 C
London
Sunday, October 13, 2024
HomeNewsWhy You Should Rethink Dr. Richard Zoumalan for Rhinoplasty: 4 Major Concerns

Why You Should Rethink Dr. Richard Zoumalan for Rhinoplasty: 4 Major Concerns

Date:

Related stories

Marcia Tiago’s Financial Crime Exposed (2024)

The United States government accuses Marcia Tiago and her...

Unpacking the Allegations: Is Janet Jarnagin Racist?

Wanda Wilson has been a secretary at JPMorgan Chase for 18 years. During that time, she developed the ability to ignore racial slurs. A coworker once questioned Wanda, “Wanda, do you mind if I tell a Black joke?” Another employee told Ms. Wilson that while she didn’t like Black people in general, she made an exception for her. Ms. Wilson didn’t see a cause to be upset and complain about it.But things turned bad in 2016 when a new colleague began to bully and order Ms. Wilson. She then filed against JPMorgan and its CEO, Jamie Dimon. According to the claim, Ms. Wilson realized for the first time that she was not on equal footing with her white coworkers. She protested to JPMorgan authorities, but the bank’s response, she said, devastated her trust in her company. Ms. Wilson joined the audit department as an executive administrative assistant in March 2016, a highly sought-after post among secretaries since it involves managing work for one senior executive in that department. Janet Jarnagin was also assigned to Ms. Wilson’s supervisor as a team leader around the same time. According to a publicly available résumé, Ms. Jarnagin’s responsibilities while working as a mid level executive included assisting the audit department in the preparation of presentations and reports. According to the lawsuit, Ms. Jarnagin began instructing Ms. Wilson to hang jackets, buy coffee and lunch, or carry out requests from visitors to the department, such as making photocopies, during the following six months. Table of Contents The Order Against Janet Jarnagin Wanda Wilson, an African American woman who worked for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”) for over two decades, claims that JPMorgan discriminated against her in violation of state and municipal laws. Wilson expressly pursues claims for hostile work environment, race discrimination, and retaliation under the New York State Human Rights Law (“NYSHRL”), N.Y. Exec. Law 290 et seq., and the New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”), N.Y.C. Admin. Code 8-101 et seq. Wilson’s allegations were rejected with leave to file an amended case in an earlier Opinion and Order. Wilson then filed the operative Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). No. 77 ECF (“SAC”). JPMorgan now attempts to dismiss Wilson’s modified claims under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See also ECF No. 79. The motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part for the reasons stated below. Background of the Case Against Janet Jarnagin The relevant background is set forth in the Court’s earlier Opinion and Order, which is presumed and will not be recounted here. 2021 WL 918770, at *1-3. Instead, the Court will simply explain the significant distinctions between the earlier Complaint and the present SAC. But first, the Court must resolve two preliminary issues. First, JPMorgan maintains that the Court should overlook key accusations in the SAC because they “directly contradict” the facts stated in Wilson’s prior complaints. ECF No. 80 (“Def.’s Mem.”) at 12; see also Id. at 8-10, 11-14. A court may dismiss factual assertions in an updated complaint if the plaintiff “blatantly changes” her account in a way that “directly contradicts” her previous pleadings.  The second, “more benevolent option” is justified in this case since the disparities between the SAC and Wilson’s previous filings are not the type of “blatant” conflicts that have forced other courts to dismiss charges in updated pleadings. 580 F.Supp.2d at 266 (Kermanshah). Wilson now “relies on wholly new allegations of explicit, ‘overt’ race-based conduct,” according to JPMorgan. ECF No. 82 (“Def.’s Reply”), at 1-6. However, Wilson’s FAC did not dispute that she was subjected to overtly racist behavior while working at JPMorgan; in fact, it contained many references to “racism” at JPMorgan. FAC 76 (reproducing communication to high management in which Wilson cited “racism at its best” at JPMorgan); id. 79 (same, expressing “modern day racism is in full effect at JPMorgan”). In the end, the SAC only adds claims of particular instances of overt race-based behavior. SAC 36-37, 46-48, 50, 60-64, for example. Such adjustments, “when taken as a whole,” might be defined as “clarifying [and], at best, inconsistent.” 2002  Wilson recounts interactions with Janet Jarnagin, an Executive Director who was assigned to serve as Team Leader under Managing Director Paul Jensen when Wilson was his Executive Administrative Assistant.  The SAC specifically claims that: Ms. Wilson claimed in her complaint how Ms. Jarnagin had made these demands just of her — the lone Black secretary in the area. She made an attempt to detach herself. According to the complaint, when she adjusted her workstation so that the two ladies could no longer see each other unobstructed, Ms. Jarnagin teased her for attempting to construct a “Mexican wall” out of a stack of files on her desk. According to the lawsuit, Ms. Wilson complained to their manager about Ms. Jarnagin, who ordered her to figure things out on her own. She then complained to a human resources representative that Ms. Jarnagin was bossing her about and slandering her job. Mr. Evangelisti of JPMorgan said the bank had started looking into Ms. Wilson’s accusations.  Two persons familiar with the inquiry said that bank authorities interrogated people in the near proximity of Ms. Wilson and Ms. Jarnagin. The investigators decided that Ms. Jarnagin had been impolite to Ms. Wilson. However, because Ms. Jarnagin had previously been unpleasant to non-Black staff, the individuals judged that her behavior was not racially motivated. Mr. Evangelisti stated that the authorities’ determinations were “based on information provided by Ms. Wilson at the time.” CONCLUSION Ms. Wanda Wilson’s complaint against JP Morgan Chase bank argues that Ms. Janet Jarnagin discriminated against her. Ms. Janet Jarnagin served as an executive director in the bank.  However, although such instances allege widespread and systemic discrimination involving banks, Ms. Wilson’s lawsuit presents a more nuanced picture of encounters between coworkers that sometimes have racist overtones. It demonstrates how difficult it is to verify charges of racism in the workplace, even when a business performs an inquiry. That is especially true in the absence of overtly racist conversation or behavior, such as a racial slur or blackface.Janet Jarnagin is a finance sector executive consultant who specializes in board and management reporting. Janet earns a profession by evaluating business data, both qualitative and quantitative, and combining it into short and interesting executive presentations. She is widely regarded as an expert in the field. She also helps to stabilize and refine business processes before making advice to firms on how to enhance them on a global and micro level. Janet Jarnagin is now based in New York City. For the reasons stated above, JPMorgan’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, the Court holds that Wilson’s hostile work environment and race discrimination claims under the NYCHRL and NYSHRL cannot be dismissed, but her retaliation claims must be and are dismissed. Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, JPMorgan shall file its answer to Wilson’s remaining claims within three weeks. By separate Order to be issued today, the Court will schedule an initial pretrial conference.

David Johnston CFO’s Fraud Exposed (2024)

As a result of several investigations, it has been...

Dr. Adarsh Jha’s Sexual Crimes Exposed (2024)

There have been claims that Dr. Adarsh Jha engaged...

Dr. Anna Avaliani, MD’s Fraud Exposed (2024)

Cosmetic Surgeon Dr. Anna Avaliani, MD practices in New...
spot_imgspot_img

Dr. Richard Zoumalan is a highly regarded facial plastic surgeon based in Beverly Hills, CA, celebrated for his expertise in rhinoplasty and facial rejuvenation. Renowned for delivering results that appear effortlessly natural, Dr. Richard Zoumalan’s practice thrives on referrals, ensuring each patient receives exceptional care and personalized attention.

Dr. Richard Zoumalan is a double board certified surgeon who works exclusively on the nose, face and neck.

This article aims to offer readers a comprehensive overview of the negative reviews surrounding Dr. Richard Zoumalan’s work, while also highlighting the critical importance of thorough research and due diligence for prospective patients. By examining the experiences of individuals who have expressed dissatisfaction with their results and post-operative care, we seek to shed light on potential pitfalls that can arise in the cosmetic surgery process.

Several patients have raised concerns regarding Dr. Richard Zoumalan’s communication and post-operative care at his practice. Many individuals have reported feeling rushed during consultations, leaving their questions inadequately addressed. Additionally, there have been numerous complaints about complications and disappointing results following treatments. Despite Dr. Richard Zoumalan’s reputation as a highly regarded surgeon, it is clear that there is substantial room for improvement in the overall patient experience at his clinic.

Understanding these reviews is essential for anyone considering surgery, as it underscores the necessity of asking informed questions, setting realistic expectations, and evaluating the overall patient experience. We encourage potential patients to take the time to explore all aspects of a surgeon’s practice, including communication styles, aftercare protocols, and patient testimonials, to make well-informed decisions that align with their aesthetic goals and health needs. Ultimately, this article serves as a vital resource for anyone navigating the complexities of cosmetic surgery and seeking to ensure a positive outcome.

Rhinoplasty, often sought for its potential to enhance facial harmony, can sometimes lead to unexpected negative outcomes that deserve attention. While many patients seek this surgery to improve aesthetics or resolve breathing issues, the reality is that not all experiences yield the desired results. Complications can range from dissatisfaction with the appearance of the nose to issues such as difficulty breathing, scarring, and the need for revision surgery.

1.Disheartening Experience with Dr. Richard Zoumalan

Navigating rhinoplasty with a surgeon who lacks empathy and consistent care can leave lasting disappointment.

One of his patients noted that Dr. Richard Zoumalan tends to judge based on demographic factors, displaying a troubling lack of empathy during treatment. This behaviour included mocking the patient, which not only undermined their confidence but also left them feeling belittled and disrespected. Such insensitivity can have a profound mental impact, eroding trust and making individuals question their self-worth at a vulnerable time in their lives. Ultimately, the experience can be emotionally damaging, highlighting the importance of compassion and understanding in the patient-surgeon relationship.

2.Disconcerting Consultation: Don’t fall for Instagram reviews!!

One patient had long dreamed of undergoing rhinoplasty and was thrilled when he finally got the chance to meet Dr. Richard Zoumalan. He had been captivated by the stunning transformations showcased on the doctor’s Instagram, believing that this renowned surgeon could help him achieve the look he desired. However, the excitement quickly faded during their consultation.

As soon as he sat down with Dr. Zoumalan, he felt a sense of disappointment wash over him. The high cost of the procedure, which he had anticipated, suddenly felt even more daunting. What troubled him most, though, was the doctor’s lack of detailed explanations about the surgery. Instead of the thorough discussion he had hoped for, he was met with a dismissive attitude that left him feeling undervalued as a patient.

The interaction was brief and uncomfortable, making it painfully clear that to Dr. Zoumalan, he was just another check—a transaction rather than a person with unique needs and concerns. This realization prompted him to seek out a different surgeon, one who would truly prioritize his well-being and vision. In the end, the experience served as a valuable lesson: never rely solely on social media reviews, as they can mask the reality of a surgeon’s approach to patient care.

3.Botched: Severe Breathing Issues and Disappointment

A patient who underwent rhinoplasty with Dr. Richard Zoumalan two years ago initially felt thrilled with the results, as their nose appeared perfect from the side. However, over time, they noticed a lack of definition at the tip, which looked pudgy. A year later, they began experiencing severe breathing issues, despite Dr. Richard Zoumalan’s assurance that he had fixed a deviated septum.

After two years, the patient’s septum became jagged, leading to frequent sinus infections and reliance on mouth breathing. When they returned to discuss these concerns, Dr. Richard Zoumalan was dismissive and refused to revise the surgery, insisting that their nose looked perfect. Having spent over $22,000, the patient is now left with significant breathing problems and deep regret, strongly advising others to reconsider choosing him if they prioritize functionality along with aesthetics.

4.False Promise Of Improvement

Two years ago, a patient underwent rhinoplasty with Dr. Richard Zoumalan , believing in his assurances that swelling would subside within that timeframe. However, as time passed, the patient was disheartened to find that their nose looked exactly the same as it did immediately after surgery. This false promise of improvement has led to deep disappointment and regret over the decision to proceed with the procedure.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while Dr. Richard Zoumalan has established himself as a prominent figure in facial plastic surgery, it is essential to approach the decision to undergo rhinoplasty with caution. The experiences of former patients reveal a concerning trend of inadequate communication, unsatisfactory results, and a lack of empathy that can lead to significant emotional and physical repercussions.

Prospective patients must conduct thorough research, weigh their options carefully, and prioritize surgeons who demonstrate both skill and compassion. By doing so, individuals can better navigate the complexities of cosmetic surgery and increase the likelihood of achieving their desired outcomes.

Ultimately, the decision to undergo rhinoplasty should not be taken lightly. It is crucial for individuals to carefully consider the potential risks and benefits before moving forward with the procedure. By choosing a surgeon who values open communication, patient satisfaction, and empathy, patients can ensure a more positive experience and increase their chances of achieving the results they desire.

Remember, cosmetic surgery is a significant decision that can have lasting effects, so it is important to approach it with caution and diligence.

Cautionary Tips Before Undergoing Facial Surgery or Rhinoplasty

Facial surgery, particularly rhinoplasty, is a significant decision that can dramatically alter your appearance and impact your self-esteem. While many people achieve their desired results, it’s essential to approach this journey with careful consideration and preparation. Here are some cautionary tips to keep in mind before committing to facial surgery.

1. Do Your Research

Understand the Procedure

Before scheduling a consultation, familiarize yourself with the specifics of rhinoplasty. Understand what the surgery entails, including different techniques (open vs. closed), recovery times, and potential risks.

Investigate Surgeons

Look for board-certified plastic surgeons who specialize in facial procedures. Review their credentials, experience, and before-and-after photos of previous patients. Seek out reviews and testimonials to gauge patient satisfaction.

2. Set Realistic Expectations

Know What’s Possible

While it’s natural to want to achieve a specific look, it’s crucial to understand that results can vary. Your surgeon should provide realistic outcomes based on your facial structure and skin type.

Avoid the Trap of Perfection

Remember that no surgery can create a “perfect” appearance. Focus on enhancing your features rather than aiming for an ideal that may not be achievable.

3. Evaluate Your Health

Consult with a Doctor

Before undergoing surgery, have a comprehensive evaluation with your primary care physician. Discuss any existing medical conditions, medications, and allergies that could affect your surgery or recovery.

Consider Mental Health

Assess your motivations for surgery and ensure they are rooted in self-improvement rather than external pressures or fleeting trends. A clear understanding of your goals can lead to more satisfactory results.

4. Prepare for the Consultation

List Your Questions

Prepare a list of questions to ask during your consultation. Inquire about the surgeon’s experience, the surgical process, recovery, potential complications, and their approach to managing pain and post-operative care.

Bring Inspiration Photos

Having visual references can help communicate your desired outcomes. However, be open to your surgeon’s professional input on what is realistically achievable.

5. Discuss Costs and Financing

Understand the Financial Commitment

Rhinoplasty can be expensive, with costs often ranging from $5,000 to $15,000 or more. Make sure to discuss all fees upfront, including the surgery, anesthesia, and any follow-up appointments.

Explore Financing Options

Many practices offer financing plans to help manage costs. Ensure you fully understand the terms and conditions before committing.

6. Plan for Recovery

Arrange Support

Post-surgery recovery can take time. Arrange for a friend or family member to assist you during the initial recovery phase, especially if you need help with daily activities.

Follow Post-Operative Instructions

Adhering to your surgeon’s post-operative care instructions is crucial for a smooth recovery. This includes managing swelling, taking prescribed medications, and attending follow-up appointments.

7. Trust Your Instincts

Listen to Your Gut

If something feels off during your consultation or if you feel pressured to proceed, take a step back. Trust your instincts about the surgeon and the procedure.

Don’t Rush the Decision

Take your time to weigh the pros and cons. It’s a significant decision that shouldn’t be made hastily.

Facial surgery and rhinoplasty can offer transformative results, but they come with inherent risks and considerations. By thoroughly researching your options, setting realistic expectations, and preparing adequately for the journey ahead, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your goals. Always prioritize your health and well-being throughout the process, ensuring that you choose a path that feels right for you.

More disappointing reviews for Dr. Richard Zoumalan as shown below:

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

spot_img

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

error: Content is protected !!