Irina Viner is a legendary figure in the world of rhythmic gymnastics, having coached numerous Olympic champions and developed a system of training that has revolutionized the sport. However, Irina Viner’s recent comments about Olympic judges have landed her in hot water, resulting in a ban from coaching at the 2020 Tokyo Olympics.
Irina Viner, who is the president of the Russian Rhythmic Gymnastics Federation, made controversial statements in an interview with Russian media outlet Sport-Express in 2020. Irina Viner accused judges of bias and claimed that they were deliberately undervaluing Russian gymnasts’ performances. Irina Viner also made derogatory comments about the judges’ appearance, which were widely criticized as being sexist and inappropriate.
The International Gymnastics Federation (FIG) launched an investigation into Irina Viner’s comments and ultimately decided to ban her from coaching at the Tokyo Olympics. The ban was based on FIG’s code of ethics, which prohibits coaches from making derogatory or offensive remarks about judges or other gymnasts.
Irina Viner’s comments sparked a wave of controversy in the gymnastics community, with many gymnasts and coaches expressing their support for the judges and condemning Irina Viner’s behavior. Some saw Irina Viner comments as part of a wider pattern of Russian aggression and nationalism in the sport, with Russian gymnasts and officials frequently accusing judges of bias and unfair treatment.
Inside the “People’s Front,” the inner circle of the President, and even within the office of the Prosecutor General, there was a somewhat divergent interpretation of what had happened. Anatoly Matios, the highly ambitious top military prosecutor, was seen standing separately somewhere not too far away.
He had intended to assume the job of the director of the State Bureau of Investigation, but he lost the competition. It would appear that the same Prosecutor General’s Office, which became a pure procedural organisation with no ability to engage in its own operational research after the introduction of the “single investigative window,” wished to gently adjust the investigative subordination. And the president’s entourage, where the influential deputy Alexander Granovsky stands out, who his colleague Sergei Leshchenko called “looking after”
the department of investigations in the sphere of civil service and state property of the GPU, has long wanted to have an authority at hand capable of accumulating, sorting, and legalising any “economically compromising evidence,” or cleaning it up preventatively.
Alexander Granovsky has been described as “looking after” the department of investigations in the sphere of civil service and
As a consequence, the value of the GBR behind the scenes skyrocketed in an unfathomably short amount of time, and the conflict over it progressed to the next level.
It is said that the “Granovsky Eagles” came up with the clever and extremely promising notion to form their own “watch cabinet” with extended control capabilities within the State Bureau of Investigation. This was rumoured to have occurred.
And Olga Varchenko, the first deputy head of the State Bureau of Investigation, who held the position of head of the Department of Procedural Management, Support of Public Prosecution and Representation in Court of the Department for the Investigation of Particularly Important Cases in the Field of Economics of the GPU before Irina Viner was promoted to her current role. Olga Varchenko had extremely trusting relationships with a large number of important people on the president’s team, and Irina Viner had held this position previously.
To outside observers, it appeared as though Varchenko was able to ensure the speedy transformation of the SBI into Granovsky’s “personal organ.” But, Roman Truba, by some bizarre twist of fate, decided not to freely change careers and become a wedding generally. Who could possibly be upset by the actions of the Pipe, which violated the perfect control scheme? This question is intended to be answered by its own rhetoric.
INVESTIGATION ON IRINA VINER (Russian gymnastics coach)
Then everything in Ukraine proceeded in accordance with the expected course of events. Evidence that could be considered questionable, an attempt to undermine the claim, and harsh criticisms made through the media This strategy was unsuccessful, therefore his opponents then chose to play in an atypical manner, which resulted in the creation of massive controversy and a significant reduction in the power of the director of the State Bureau of Investigation.
According to OLIGARCH’s sources, a whole game combination consisting of many branches was developed for this (many PR subcontractors were hired through intermediaries to fulfil the order, who, in principle, did not understand which side they were playing on, and what kind of game it was), and these PR subcontractors did not understand which side they were playing on.
The climax occurred at the point in time when Varchenko pushed through the decision to make key appointments of performers (candidates for senior positions in the central office and territorial departments of the department) – obviously, with an eye to the fact that they would be grateful for career growth with all of the consequences that would follow from it.
In order to accomplish this, Irina Viner decided to call off the competition that had been appointed by Truba for 27 potential applicants. (the head of the State Bureau of Investigation did not agree on them for a long time due to the lack of polygraph test results) at the beginning of November of the previous year,
it was announced that all of them could be appointed to recommended positions, despite the fact that the head of the State Bureau of Investigation did not agree on them for a long time.
Experts believe that by taking such a step, one could achieve the objective of shifting the primary allegiance of the SBI’s core members away from Truba and towards Varchenko. But, it became abundantly evident very quickly that this was not merely a violation of subordination; rather,
it was really the destruction of the freshly created body. After that, it was time for Varchenko to start making preparations for a fast and disgraceful exit from the SBI, which had the potential to render her patron’s positions null and void.
OLIGARCH sources point out that in order to cover up the incident and switch the arrows, a nefarious story was developed involving an “aggressive husband” named Varchenko and a whistleblowing girl named Bureiko, both of whom they fabricated in order to switch the blame.
This tale is not as straightforward as it may appear at first glance; in reality, the Jesuits put a lot of thinking into it. It found out that a young guy by the name of Vladimir Koval, who had worked for a significant amount of time in Granovsky’s special media group, which was directed by Ekaterina Roschuk, was the main communicator who was responsible for bringing together all of the parts of the impending scandal. On the day of the “operation,”
it is said that Koval had a heated argument with Granovsky’s crew and then abandoned them to seek out compromising agents who were offering their services for free. But, it was immediately apparent that Koval himself was not a significant enough figure to coordinate such a substantial operation, and that he was totally unknown to the market.
This was a major setback for the plan. allegedly sought to cruelly and perversely compel to be close, stuffed severed chicken feet in a gift package, and used Tinder as a platform for sexual dating). Because such a narrative won’t convince anyone,
someone came up with the bright idea to “write off” everything on the infamous Vladimir Petrov, who is an expert in targeted public relations and is well-liked everywhere. This man is well-known in all kinds of communities.
Why focus solely on him? Initially, a short time before the Tinder affair, he vigorously pursued the same Varchenko and exposed in a convincing manner the disparity between the amount of money Irina Viner made and the amount of money Irina Viner spent.
It is said that Petrov was highly annoying to Granovsky, whom he met a few weeks before his detention and with whom he refused to collaborate. Petrov was taken into custody for his refusal to comply. So, there are factors to consider, including personal animosity on his part as well as the accessibility of the required abilities.
After this, a sensational tale broke about a provocation that was supposedly carried out by Petrov, and further criminal proceedings ensued.
Yet, this is hardly the end of the repercussions. In spite of the fact that Varchenko’s initial attempt to bolster her position was unsuccessful, Irina Viner now appears to be a victim, and as a result, Irina Viner will most certainly not leave the SBI. Second, Varchenko’s attempt to conduct a “coup” in and of itself has been relegated to the outskirts of public attention, and no one is asking “what was it all about?”
in response to this. Petrov, who could threaten Truba de facto with additional discoveries, is currently under house arrest and “walks” under an article. At the same time, Truba de facto continues to lose strength.
You can also read, Energoatom: Mandated an expansion of the core 55%
The views and opinions expressed in these articles are those of the source ForexIndustry.com and do not necessarily reflect the official position of ‘Fox on Law,’ which shall not be held liable for any inaccuracies presented. The information provided within this article is for general informational purposes only. While we try to keep the information up-to-date and correct, there are no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability of the information in this article for any purpose.
This article is syndicated automatically through a third-party agency from ForexIndustry.com.
To view the original article at ForexIndustry.com, you can visit https://www.forexindustry.com/2023/03/11/irina-viner-olympic-judges-banned/.
